Earlier quoted context omitted.
>> The author also seems to be somewhat deceptive - "I sound like a terrible wife, but it's for journalism!" No, it seems like the author played a prank on her husband a while back and used that to neuroticaly follow him, then tried to excuse that behavior by writing this fluff piece. You need to read more of the article. > Some states, including New York, where we live, have laws criminalizing this sort of thing. No…
I think you replied a level too low.
I used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS tracker to watch my husband’s every move
61–70 of 322 posts
Re: I used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS tracker to watch my husband’s every move
#62I hate this AirTag because besides being pointless (nothing you couldn't do before), it fosters a fear of your neighbor while placing tech companies as your trusted friends. There's no evidence these, "people have freaked out after finding AirTags hidden in their bags and on their cars" are anything other than just stray airtags their owners would very much like back. Just because police (or journalists for that matt…
While they're alone in a car, sure. But as soon as they're around folks with iPhones, they're tracked just fine and will never get the notifications the husband in the article got.
Re: I used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS tracker to watch my husband’s every move
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not everything has to offer new info. Sometimes things bear repeating, it's how we add emphasis and continue the conversation. Coming out with "Apple is doing a poor job" just once isn't going to move the needle. People have to hear it over and over in a relatable way.
Fair point - but in that case, I found the author's account unrelatable, so much as to approach uncredible. Maybe it hits different for other people, but I don't appreciate being given a conclusion without any good discussion
Re: I used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS tracker to watch my husband’s every move
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, I will present my viewpoint. I didn't find this article relatable. I didn't find new information from this article. I think this article objectively is hard to relate to and has little new information.I will share my viewpoint in a comments section - feel free to disagree. If you think it's shallow, it's probably because the original piece didn't have much meat to begin with.
>Yes, I will present my viewpoint You can, or, alternatively, you can simply acknowledge you’re not the intended audience for the article, and that you may have over-stepped rhetorically in declaring a complete absence of value with respect to insight or novelty in the article; which is there, and obviously so.
For example, I found this comment section much more enlightening than the article, because commenters here made better discussion than I found in the article.
Re: I used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS tracker to watch my husband’s every move
#65Re: I used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS tracker to watch my husband’s every move
#66My comment isn’t specific to AirTags, but there’s a much larger conversation that needs to be had about this gray area of stalking capabilities that are now built into many mainstream products. Here’s a pattern I’ve seen play out more than once among friends and family - they share their location willingly and for seemingly benign reasons. It’s helpful to know when you’ll be getting home so I can start dinner! Just i…
You can’t fix a lack of emotional fortitude and insecurities with technology. These are mental health challenges exacerbated by the tools available.
Re: I used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS tracker to watch my husband’s every move
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fair point - but in that case, I found the author's account unrelatable, so much as to approach uncredible. Maybe it hits different for other people, but I don't appreciate being given a conclusion without any good discussion
It's resembling an attack of the author, instead of the authors ideas, aka a form of ad hominem. So it's kinda ironic to say the author adds nothing while simultaneously adding nothing with a non sequitur.
For example, this is actually a story about a mother worried about her child. I really appreciate that! What I don't appreciate is someone using that to present unsupported positions.
I am attacking the piece that she wrote and it's because I don't think it was a good piece.
Re: I used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS tracker to watch my husband’s every move
#68My comment isn’t specific to AirTags, but there’s a much larger conversation that needs to be had about this gray area of stalking capabilities that are now built into many mainstream products. Here’s a pattern I’ve seen play out more than once among friends and family - they share their location willingly and for seemingly benign reasons. It’s helpful to know when you’ll be getting home so I can start dinner! Just i…
Re: I used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS tracker to watch my husband’s every move
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Yes, I will present my viewpoint You can, or, alternatively, you can simply acknowledge you’re not the intended audience for the article, and that you may have over-stepped rhetorically in declaring a complete absence of value with respect to insight or novelty in the article; which is there, and obviously so.
I didn't find any value, and I look forward to someone presenting some value other than "I don't like your critique". For example, I found this comment section much more enlightening than the article, because commenters here made better discussion than I found in the article.
Not to be crude, but that seems like a personal deficiency, not a demerit of the article. The "commenters here" who "made better discussion than I found in the article," are discussing the implications of the article's information and presenting interesting perspectives. If you didn't find anything of value, perhaps you could try thinking a bit harder or for a bit longer. Others have done so successfully.
Re: I used Apple AirTags, Tiles and a GPS tracker to watch my husband’s every move
#70Can someone explain to me (because I cannot work it myself) why everyone is suddenly worried about AirTags yet these kinds of devices have been around for a while (eg the Samsung Galaxy SmartTag was released last year and little was talked about it). And GPS tracking isn't even a new thing either. So why is it most conversations focus on the AirTag? What is it that the AirTag does better/worse/differently to the othe…
AirTags have a huge advantage in that they use ALL iPhones as part of the tracking network, regardless of whether the iPhone owner has an AirTag themself. This allows them to work over short ranges with a tiny battery as they only need to be close enough to any iPhone for them to be trackable.