Live data from Hacker News

Telegram now censoring channels in Germany for “violating local laws”

netzpolitik.org

111–120 of 228 posts

Re: Telegram now censoring channels in Germany for “violating local laws”

#111
If they are holocaust deniers, As much as I love free speech, I can understand where the german government is coming from. we can't allow THAT to ever happen again.

This will probably get flagged or downvoted to oblivion but meanwhile, no one bats an eye at the worldwide brushing under the rug of the Palestinian Apartheid.

Re: Telegram now censoring channels in Germany for “violating local laws”

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Germany bans things like Holocaust denial and certain things about far right political parties. It’s not the American way but I’m quite ok with Germany doing this.

> It’s not the American way but I’m quite ok with Germany doing this. Why? Germany has literally criminalised thinking the wrong things and denies people to associate freely based on the things that they happen to think. It doesn't stop those people thinking those things and it doesn't stop people from associating with each other.

Those people have killed ~200 people in Germany since reunification. (Older data aren't reliable.) Putting a brake on that isn't unjustified.

Re: Telegram now censoring channels in Germany for “violating local laws”

#113

The article is written in German, but with a Google Translate you can understand the just of it. Apparently Telegram added a new blocking system based on phone numbers, sorta a geo-blocking thing, and people with German phone numbers registered on their Telegram accounts aren't able to access those blocked channels. Also, unlike the previous block this one applies even to the users who are using the app downloaded di…

Telegram blocked calls to violence before, so technically it's nothing new.

Re: Telegram now censoring channels in Germany for “violating local laws”

#114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you want to do business in a country you usually have to follow the laws of the country. If you are not following these laws and you get booted out of their respective markets you can't cry censorship it's that easy.

It doesn't seem like Telegram is actually doing business in Germany. I feel like simply having German citizens using your app doesn't mean that the nation state of Germany has the same authority over your business as if you were actually registered as a GmbH in their territory.

I believe the German government has a novel interpretation of their jurisdiction as covering any website with content in the German language (see the Project Gutenberg debacle).

Re: Telegram now censoring channels in Germany for “violating local laws”

#115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> edit: "Shouting fire in a crowded theater" was a reason given for jailing US socialists who were protesting against the WWI draft. This is no longer standing case law as it was overturned by Brandbenburg v. Ohio

Of course. Only mentioning it because the only explanation of the limits of free speech that an American can quote was formulated to keep peaceniks from passing out flyers.

It's an irrelevant exception because it hasn't been law for over half a century now.

Re: Telegram now censoring channels in Germany for “violating local laws”

#116
post #55
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

That's pretty "no true Scottsman". Some of the Ottawa protesters are waving swastika flags. If it walks like a duck and waves duck flags. Sources citing the presence of swastika flags, (linking multiple because a couple are paywalled): https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/10/world/canada/ottawa-truck... https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/thousands-protest-covid... https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/ottawa-covid-trucker-…

The key takeaway is that if someone wants to discredit a protest movement they should get a few goons to dress up in black, mask their faces, and get a Nazi flag. Have them stand near the protest area, get a photographer to snap a photo and then duck out quickly.

The photo will spread, the media will pick it up, and a sizeable number of people will endlessly harp on the fact that a Nazi flag was present. It won't matter how many people were at the protest, or how long the demonstration lasted for. And no one in the media will apply the same contextualization that produced "fiery, but mostly peaceful".

Re: Telegram now censoring channels in Germany for “violating local laws”

#118
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It’s not the American way but I’m quite ok with Germany doing this. Why? Germany has literally criminalised thinking the wrong things and denies people to associate freely based on the things that they happen to think. It doesn't stop those people thinking those things and it doesn't stop people from associating with each other.

Those people have killed ~200 people in Germany since reunification. (Older data aren't reliable.) Putting a brake on that isn't unjustified.

So you are saying that the laws in place haven't worked?

Re: Telegram now censoring channels in Germany for “violating local laws”

#119
post #107
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does Matrix have groups like Telegram's? I thought Matrix was just a messenger app.

Matrix has "rooms".

Do rooms work like a blog/feeds/readers? I thought they were more like Signal's groups.

Re: Telegram now censoring channels in Germany for “violating local laws”

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Germany bans things like Holocaust denial and certain things about far right political parties. It’s not the American way but I’m quite ok with Germany doing this.

> It’s not the American way but I’m quite ok with Germany doing this. Why? Germany has literally criminalised thinking the wrong things and denies people to associate freely based on the things that they happen to think. It doesn't stop those people thinking those things and it doesn't stop people from associating with each other.

Do you really want people to stereotype all Germans as Nazis and Holocaust deniers? Because I'm pretty sure this is what would end up happening if the German government did not go to the trouble of explicitly banning these things, regardless of how few people actually advocated them. It's practically a free boost in optics and national pride that benefits pretty much all Germans at basically zero cost, because it's only banning the most obscenely offensive and pointless idiocy. (Yes, Holocaust denial is idiotic - the evidence of it in German archives and elsewhere is utterly overwhelming. The remaining question wrt. history is whether Hitler and the Nazis actually planned even worse genocides than what they ended up doing, and the most likely answer is yes, they absolutely did.)
Post reply on HN