This is one of my favourite pieces of science feature reporting. I lack the background in computer science to better appreciate the technical angles of the story, but for the present, the article made a strong impression because of the underdog story: "The library was familiar ground, where he had taught himself Greek, Latin, logic, and mathematics—better than home, where his father insisted he drop out of school and…
"There was just one person who wasn’t happy about the reunion: Wiener’s wife. " "And so she invented a story. She sat Wiener down and informed him that when their daughter, Barbara, had stayed at McCulloch’s house in Chicago, several of “his boys” had seduced her. Wiener immediately sent an angry telegram to Wiesner: “Please inform [Pitts and Lettvin] that all connection between me and your projects is permanently abolished. They are your problem. Wiener.” He never spoke to Pitts again. And he never told him why.3"
What a wedge to be driven between the sum of the parts. I've started to think pregnancy is such a drain on the female body that the change in behaviour in women afterwards seem like minor psychotic episodes which the medical profession ignore and pass off as "normalised" behaviour. In a round about way, she legally killed him because her actions are not recognised as murder by the legal profession.
Edit: One other point on his theorem, with quantifying the chemical effects in the body & brain, you are never going to be able to mathematically model a chemical entity with logic. We are complex realtime chemical reactions, we are not able to quantify the activity of every cell exactly, only generalise which introduces a margin of error in being able to predict a biological entities next move.