21–30 of 52 posts
So your solution is take home coding. How is doing an assignment for every company I apply for better than practising coding questions that can be used in interviews at any company?
The other day I got a PDF with prep materials for Facebook interview. It's a few pages of pure insanity, e.g. "In your tech screen, you’ll be asked to solve one or two problems in under 35 minutes. Practice coding solutions to medium and hard problems in less than 15 minutes each to help you be ready for the constraints during the interview.", "If your tech screen is in person, you'll use a whiteboard" Who can solve…
Yes :) .
It's known for quite some years that this interview approach produces _those_. By induction, those who have FAANG lines in their resumes are, unfortunately, suspicious for this reason alone. All else being equal, non-FAANG person would get preference on the interview, and seeing somebody applying to FAANG causes both frowns and sighs. One should be really desperate for that these days.
:(
So your solution is take home coding. How is doing an assignment for every company I apply for better than practising coding questions that can be used in interviews at any company?
At Aserto we recognize this problem and address it by offering candidates a choice. They can either take a take-home assignment, or opt for a whiteboard style interview question. This approach lets us meet candidates where they're most comfortable and removes a degree of bias from our interview results.
All I know is, FAANGs can get away with anything, because the supply of engineers is just that much. There's no shortage of engineers who are preparing months and months on end, solving hundreds or thousands of leetcode problems. There are coaching institutes, and an entire industry devoted to cracking these interviews. The financial reward is worth it for most people.
Think “entrance exams”
The other day I got a PDF with prep materials for Facebook interview. It's a few pages of pure insanity, e.g. "In your tech screen, you’ll be asked to solve one or two problems in under 35 minutes. Practice coding solutions to medium and hard problems in less than 15 minutes each to help you be ready for the constraints during the interview.", "If your tech screen is in person, you'll use a whiteboard" Who can solve…
The other day I got a PDF with prep materials for Facebook interview. It's a few pages of pure insanity, e.g. "In your tech screen, you’ll be asked to solve one or two problems in under 35 minutes. Practice coding solutions to medium and hard problems in less than 15 minutes each to help you be ready for the constraints during the interview.", "If your tech screen is in person, you'll use a whiteboard" Who can solve…
> Leetcode psychos? Yes :) . It's known for quite some years that this interview approach produces _those_. By induction, those who have FAANG lines in their resumes are, unfortunately, suspicious for this reason alone. All else being equal, non-FAANG person would get preference on the interview, and seeing somebody applying to FAANG causes both frowns and sighs. One should be really desperate for that these days. :(
The other day I got a PDF with prep materials for Facebook interview. It's a few pages of pure insanity, e.g. "In your tech screen, you’ll be asked to solve one or two problems in under 35 minutes. Practice coding solutions to medium and hard problems in less than 15 minutes each to help you be ready for the constraints during the interview.", "If your tech screen is in person, you'll use a whiteboard" Who can solve…
I was an engineering hiring manager for several small startups. I never asked for coding on a whiteboard. I asked some work style questions and then concentrated on a collaborative exercise where I laid out a problem and important applicable technology. Then I'd answer any Google-ish questions in realtime. This technique found good collaborators and also which people were good problem solvers. Never made a bad hire f…
An example: one we used a few times was "we decided we want to build a drone for the police. So if a bank is being robbed the cop who arrived first could take it out and it will help solve the crime." Some people would ask a bunch of constraints up front; others would just dive in and ask questions as they went. And they'd think about the problem "so we want to chase the getaway car long enough until a regular copter can get airborne, so let's assume X MPH for Y minutes minimum". Someone else thought "small is probably better because perhaps it can look into the bank when it would be dangerous for a person to try, and we have to assume a lot of them will be destroyed, so cost matters." etc etc.
Another great one is "Jucero (this is just after they collapsed) has inspired us to make a bluetooth-only coffee machine". My favorite candidate started with "even with BT you'll really need a control panel for reasons XXX and YYY. And BT generally won't add much, if anything, but if product management insists, let's think up some halfway plausible use cases..." and then ended up in a discussion of the protocol and how to think about making it robust against failure."
These were always fun, and told us a bit about how the candidate thinks, without the pressure of doing it "right". Often the solutions were excessively elaborate, or missed elements a real product would need, but so what? They were "first drafts" in a situation with some pressure. And who cares about remembering the precise arguments to a function or anything that needed looking up.
And the length of these things helped strain out bullshitters. One candidate immediately said "the best way to solve this is to use an XXX. The other interviewer and I looked at each other excitedly. That was the best way and nobody else had suggested it. The candidate went on to ignore XXX, even when we asked questions in the hope of sending the discussion back that way. It's as if they had said "oh, well for this you'll need an adjustable wing" and then drew a wheeled vehicle that could not fly.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Am I weird for thinking that sounds fun to do?
You are not weird. Definitely feels like two nerds nerding it out to see if they grokk each other. But then again, it wouldn't scale well.