Live data from Hacker News

Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy

bbc.co.uk

161–170 of 827 posts

Re: Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy

#161

OK so with fusion everybody loves it because the fuel would be clean and nearly endless. Isn't that what solar power offers? Nobody wants to deploy solar due to high upfront cost. However, wouldn't the startup on a fusion reactor be much greater?

No. Fusion is completely different from solar. It can provide steady energy without going down for years. Solar goes down multiple times a day.

Re: Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Solar takes up quite a lot of space, but most importantly only works for a portion of a 24 hour cycle.

The Chinese & Japanese governments are investing in space based solar which solves the nighttime problem: https://wonderfulengineering.com/china-is-aiming-to-build-a-... https://nextrendsasia.org/japan-pioneer-of-transferring-sola... But we really need more energy storage, and there are plenty of good ideas in this area too: better batteries, gravity bases systems, crowd sourced storage, etc.

I don't know much about the physics, but it seems like you'd want square miles of solar panels, even in space, and then there's the problem of getting that energy back to earth. On the other hand, in space you'd get a lot of light frequencies that are rarer on Earth. It's not clear to me if those could be harnessed somehow. Regardless, it's a creative idea.

Re: Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy

#163

As an uneducated observer to nuclear physics, I could not tell the significance of this achievement. Did we finally learn how to extract more energy from a fusion rector than we supplied to operate it? Could anyone more in the know here explain in simpler and more practical terms please?

> Did we finally learn how to extract more energy from a fusion rector than we supplied to operate it?

No.

> Could anyone more in the know here explain in simpler and more practical terms please?

It's impossible to tell because the story is incoherent. The central claim is that they "release[d] a record 59 megajoules of sustained fusion energy" but this makes no sense. One can talk about sustained power (over a period of time) but "sustained energy" is a category error because energy is just power integrated over time. You can get 59 megajoules out of your wall socket if you wait long enough.

They apparently did something that had never been done before, but there's no way to tell exactly what that was from what is written in this story.

(This kind of obfuscation is not unusual in fusion research. A cynic might argue that this is because if they were clear about the actual state of things their funding would cease.)

Re: Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy

#164
post #100

The title is unfair in suggesting this is a result coming from Oxford institutions alone. As correctly put in the EUROfusion official press release, the EUROfusion consortium comprises "4,800 experts, students and staff from across Europe, co-funded by the European Commission". Edited to add the link (now on HN front page): https://www.euro-fusion.org/news/2022/european-researchers-a...

Yes, additionally JET stands for Joint European Torus, it's not British.

The title is as misleading as calling ITER French because it's located in France.

Re: Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy

#165
a comment from a friend of mine “ I worked at JET for 2 years, That device is from 1979, it's a fucking joke and the $ millions being pumped into it every year would be more useful as paper fuel for a steam engine... the SPARC thing (private, but also in Oxford and in the same compound as JET)is much more promising”

Re: Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy

#166

According to Sabine Hossenfelder, published numbers are frequently mis-stated on purpose. When you look at frequently reported Q Plasma (or plasma efficiency) we are not that far from it being > 1. However, we should look at Q Total (total efficiency), which is still way below https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ4W1g-6JiY For years, I was hoping fusion is close. After watching Sabine's video, I'm not so optimistic anym…

Nothing concrete to add, just the anecdote that the plasma physics class I took in grad school hands down had some of the sketchiest looking physicist math I think I have ever seen. Felt like a SWAT team from the mathematics department might burst through the door at any time.

Re: Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy

#167

I love how one of the articles on the HN frontpage says "Oxford", the other says "European researchers"

But people living in Oxford are European? If one article says "North American researchers" and another article says "Researchers from California", would that be strange to you as well? Or if one article said "African researchers" and another said "Researchers from Rwanda"?

Re: Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy

#168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Solar takes up quite a lot of space, but most importantly only works for a portion of a 24 hour cycle.

The Chinese & Japanese governments are investing in space based solar which solves the nighttime problem: https://wonderfulengineering.com/china-is-aiming-to-build-a-... https://nextrendsasia.org/japan-pioneer-of-transferring-sola... But we really need more energy storage, and there are plenty of good ideas in this area too: better batteries, gravity bases systems, crowd sourced storage, etc.

Ideas are great however even a small country like the Netherlands is looking at a trillion € bill to switch to 100% renewable by 2050.

Re: Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy

#169
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No one will get funded with that mentality in such a high-risk high-reward area like fusion. But indeed after so many headlines I agree with you that no one gets excited about these news anymore.

I'm not really sure about that. The promise of fusion power is so great that it would be idiotic not to throw money at it. The US was spending a billion a week in the Afghanistan war.

You just gave a great example of the irrationality of how things are funded. Idiotic things get cash thrown at them, National healthcare rests on the sidelines.

Re: Major breakthrough on nuclear fusion energy

#170

OK so with fusion everybody loves it because the fuel would be clean and nearly endless. Isn't that what solar power offers? Nobody wants to deploy solar due to high upfront cost. However, wouldn't the startup on a fusion reactor be much greater?

Solar is using the fusion generator in the sky, which is out of view half the time and obscured by clouds some other times.

Fusion is having our own little portable sun that can be utilized more efficiently.

Post reply on HN