My main criticism and cynicism from articles like these (related: prosthetics) is that they help the few people that are lucky, popular, or rich; lucky to have a doctor or to find a program and get into it; popular because they end up in social media 'feel good' posts and articles; rich because it's experimental, low-volume tech or treatments that require going abroad. Popular can also translate to being able to affo…
Sorry if that came off as antagonistic. I think I actually agree with the overall sentiment that luck and popularity shouldn't be barriers to healthcare, but experimentation is a necessary part of the process. And at the very least, luck is inherent to experimentation.