Anyone know where it was shot? It looks like somewhere around Seattle. West Seattle maybe? Magnolia?
FMI http://www.myballard.com/2008/09/11/microsoft-ad-set-in-ball...
71–80 of 85 posts
Anyone know where it was shot? It looks like somewhere around Seattle. West Seattle maybe? Magnolia?
FMI http://www.myballard.com/2008/09/11/microsoft-ad-set-in-ball...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have the opinion that the 'misunderstandings' largely consist of either preconceived notions of what the ad campaign would be like or, more commonly, anti-Microsoft sentiment repeatedly raising its ugly head and any Microsoft advertising campaign would not please those people. I think the ads are generally quite strong - kooky, memorable, unique and a talking point... if not particularly funny (FWIW, I didn't find…
"I have the opinion that the 'misunderstandings' largely consist of either preconceived notions of what the ad campaign would be like or, more commonly, anti-Microsoft sentiment repeatedly raising its ugly head and any Microsoft advertising campaign would not please those people." They're trying to change anti-Microsoft sentiment with these ads. If the ad does nothing for people who don't like Microsoft, than arguabl…
This is not just marketing, it's politics. You could draw parallels to current US presidential election, but I won't because I know where it will lead.
Do you think the reference to the "old car with weeds growing over it's tires" is a reference to mac os x being built on top of *nix?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wait, I can create buzz by creating something bad and gradually making it better? That sounds brilliant - suddenly a lot of my projects have gained a new perspective...
exhibit a) cuil I rest my case.
Fail
The fact that we are talking about their ads means that the campaign is working.
The fact that we are talking about their ads means that the campaign is working.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The comments pro or con are irrelevant; the submission and ranking (currently the #2 story) are my concerns. We're giving free placement to a company that is (1) rich enough to buy our attention, if it needs it; (2) arguably 'dead' as an animating force for our industry (as in PG's 'Microsoft is Dead' essay). Their desperate-but-cutesy ad campaign does not deserve to be our 'news'. Voting up this goofball lowbrow cra…
Nonsense. The ad is interesting and faintly amusing, and the advertising strategy from which it is drawn is worthy of discussion. I think you are vastly overreacting to say it is "goofball lowbrow crap", or that it "makes us into Microsoft's tools": YCers are more than capable of viewing an ad without being brainwashed, I think.
But should a 4+ minute skit from Microsoft be 'top of mind' news for hackers? Did watching it make you a better hacker? Did it give you marketing insights that work for anyone other than a fading monopolist with money to burn on sitcom celebrities? Do the best hackers spend a lot of time watching, and chit-chatting about, giant companies' clumsy viral marketing efforts?
The value here is in finding what is uncommon. Content-free celebrity-filled Microsoft ad campaigns are as depressingly common as you can get.
The message is clear: "Windows, for IQs 100 and below".