Live data from Hacker News

Nerdle = Like Wordle but with Equations

nerdlegame.com

81–90 of 150 posts

Re: Nerdle = Like Wordle but with Equations

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah I feel the same way. I want wordle to be about guessing words, not constructing some max entropy string within the constraints.

I use that same strategy in Wordle. Most often my first word is SOARE and the second is MINTY… unless I got like three matches in the first word, it’s better to get extra data quickly.

You should give hard mode a try. That makes it a lot less repetitive and more fun.

Re: Nerdle = Like Wordle but with Equations

#82
post #29
post #10

EDIT: game's over. It's already been done: https://rwmpelstilzchen.gitlab.io/wordles/ Is anyone keeping track? So now we have: *wordlists*: - [wordle]( https://www.powerlanguage.co.uk/wordle/ ): wordlist picked by creators partner - [byrdle]( https://rbrignall.github.io/byrdle/ ): wordlist has to do with choral music - [lewdle]( https://www.lewdlegame.com ): lewd words - [sweardle]( https://sweardle.com/ ): 4 letter…

[worldle] https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/

also Globle: https://globle-game.com/

Re: Nerdle = Like Wordle but with Equations

#83

I get the same feeling as everyone. There is no point in the game because even a single digit wrong is no clue at all. In my 1st and only attempt, I entered 1 + 2+ 8 = 11 and both pluses, the 2 the 1 and the 8 were right, with only the 2 in the wrong position. And yet that gave zero clue to what the other number was... and it turned out to be another 8, which made finding the solution really luck-based.

that is so odd - I think I had the same situation as well. I'm not particularly numeric so I was briefly excited (I tried an available number and realized it fit!) but then figured out that there were multiple solution.

And finally lost because I too didn't realize that I could re-use an 8. I'd feel bad but it could have been any of the choices I did take so ... maybe not so fun.

Re: Nerdle = Like Wordle but with Equations

#86

I get the same feeling as everyone. There is no point in the game because even a single digit wrong is no clue at all. In my 1st and only attempt, I entered 1 + 2+ 8 = 11 and both pluses, the 2 the 1 and the 8 were right, with only the 2 in the wrong position. And yet that gave zero clue to what the other number was... and it turned out to be another 8, which made finding the solution really luck-based.

Ha! I played the exact same first game! https://pasteboard.co/NYP4YfnNj0kk.jpg

? As in Worldle itself (except in hard mode), you don't need to match what you've deduced already . So, your second line could have been some equation with (most of) the digits 3,4,5,7,9 (and whatever you need to make it an equation). The colour of those then would have told you all you need to know to win.

Re: Nerdle = Like Wordle but with Equations

#87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What frustrated me was the guessing. By equation 3 I had everything narrowed down except the 1s place in the answer which was same as number in the equation. So, I spent the next 3 guesses trying the remaining digits, and eventually losing with 2 more digits left to try.

You can test every digit and symbol in 2 guesses. Once you’ve done that it normally takes another 1 or 2 guesses to get the answer.

Yes, notably there is no hard mode. Elimination seems necessary in order to have a chance of completing in 6 tries.
Post reply on HN