Earlier quoted context omitted.
lol, the arrogance to call out someone for something they actual are a champion in fighting.
HN has a lot of "both sides are the same" centrists and libertarians. They don't realize there there is still a tiny thread of pro-worker pro-middle-class democratic action in the US government. I have no idea how much longer it can survive, but people like Wyden, AOC, Bernie, etc fight the good fight and that goes against everything centrists and 3rd party types believe. Everyone is a republican to them and when sho…
IRS to ditch biometric requirement for online access
81–90 of 181 posts
Re: IRS to ditch biometric requirement for online access
#82It's the most difficult login process I've ever encountered and I've lived on the internet since 1996.
The fact that it's the only vendor you can use should be illegal.
This barrier has been put between Oregonians and the unemployment benefits they're entitled to. <- This is a bigger story IMHO.
Re: IRS to ditch biometric requirement for online access
#83“Login.gov is already used to access 200 websites run by 28 Federal agencies and over 40 million Americans have accounts,” Wyden wrote in a letter to the IRS today. “Unfortunately, login.gov has not yet reached its full potential, in part because many agencies have flouted the Congressional mandate that they use it, and because successive Administrations have failed to prioritize digital identity. The cost of this in…
I have used login.gov for my global entry application and I'm actually impressed. The only complaints I have with it are: 1. It doesn't make it obvious on how to add additional u2f keys (you have to go to login.gov explicitly to do that) 2. I still can't find a way to remove u2f keys But then when I used id.me with CA DMV I'm also impressed by it (granted CA DMV does not require any crazy biometric stuff there like I…
When I go to login.gov and click on "Your authentication methods", each of my security keys is listed with a "Remove key" link next to it...
Re: IRS to ditch biometric requirement for online access
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
lol, the arrogance to call out someone for something they actual are a champion in fighting.
HN has a lot of "both sides are the same" centrists and libertarians. They don't realize there there is still a tiny thread of pro-worker pro-middle-class democratic action in the US government. I have no idea how much longer it can survive, but people like Wyden, AOC, Bernie, etc fight the good fight and that goes against everything centrists and 3rd party types believe. Everyone is a republican to them and when sho…
Re: IRS to ditch biometric requirement for online access
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lol. Its always the Republicans. If it was priority for the Dems, they'd have done it. They have gotten through several other things the Republicans opposed. Anyhow, the better alternative is to return to lower the rates and remove deductions (aside from the standard deduction). Even simpler yet would be to go to a flat tax with an extremely high standard deduction (e.g. ~$50k with ~10% after that). I can't think of…
This is a really good point - if the tax code were a few dozen pages for the common case instead of a few hundred , then you might not even need tax-prep software in the first place. "The best program is the one that doesn't exist", to quote a popular refrain. Ongoing software projects require periodic refactoring to reduce complexity and increase comprehension - why would the law be any different?
Having citizens exposed directly to the mechanics of it during the filing process is a policy choice and the way to fix that is to change the policy, not try to reinvent the tax code from first principles.
This is a complex set of laws yes but it is also detailed multi-generational documentation of all the shit people have tried to pull. You don't just throw that out because it has grown complex. Like all necessary complexity, you isolate and manage it, not spray it all over the end user.
Re: IRS to ditch biometric requirement for online access
#86Re: IRS to ditch biometric requirement for online access
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
What lesson do you think organizations learned from that breach? (As it relates to this article.) The pattern I see is: 1. Company collects and stores private consumer info. 2. Company gets hacked. 3. Company share price unaffected. 4. Company sued in class-action lawsuit. 5. Company settles by offering discounted/free products to victims of the hack. ("A $50 value!") Lawyers make a few million. Result: company gets…
> Sounds like a good deal if the company is too big to fail. I don't know why Equifax is too big to fail. But then again, I don't know why Goldman Sachs was too big to fail either.
Re: IRS to ditch biometric requirement for online access
#88“Login.gov is already used to access 200 websites run by 28 Federal agencies and over 40 million Americans have accounts,” Wyden wrote in a letter to the IRS today. “Unfortunately, login.gov has not yet reached its full potential, in part because many agencies have flouted the Congressional mandate that they use it, and because successive Administrations have failed to prioritize digital identity. The cost of this in…
If the IRS (or Sen. Wyden) is looking for a "core government service" which has been inappropriately commercialized, they might start with tax preparation.
Re: IRS to ditch biometric requirement for online access
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is a really good point - if the tax code were a few dozen pages for the common case instead of a few hundred , then you might not even need tax-prep software in the first place. "The best program is the one that doesn't exist", to quote a popular refrain. Ongoing software projects require periodic refactoring to reduce complexity and increase comprehension - why would the law be any different?
I think we've fairly well established that the complexity of the code isn't the problem. The IRS knows what you owe and could just tell you if they wanted to. Having citizens exposed directly to the mechanics of it during the filing process is a policy choice and the way to fix that is to change the policy, not try to reinvent the tax code from first principles. This is a complex set of laws yes but it is also detail…
The IRS has no way to know which of your expenditures are tax-deductible.
Re: IRS to ditch biometric requirement for online access
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
lol, the arrogance to call out someone for something they actual are a champion in fighting.
HN has a lot of "both sides are the same" centrists and libertarians. They don't realize there there is still a tiny thread of pro-worker pro-middle-class democratic action in the US government. I have no idea how much longer it can survive, but people like Wyden, AOC, Bernie, etc fight the good fight and that goes against everything centrists and 3rd party types believe. Everyone is a republican to them and when sho…
But you’re right, there are a few left that seem to be fighting for the people. Some are effective and others are naive but well meaning.
But they are clearly the minority. They’re fighting bombastic partisan media coverage on both sides, they’re often fighting people within their parties, they’re often struggling just to earn their place.
At first, you get excited at the prospect of holding police accountable when Rand Paul introduces laws against knockless warrants, or you hope for the prospect of a real, sustainable income plan from Yang or Gabbard.
And then you watch as they get maligned and lied about on Fox News and CNN alike. You think, “this plan they’re advocating for will surely attract support from the rest of their party” and then you watch in awe as both sides warp, twist, or outright attack their plans.
You watch with weary eyes as someone like AOC who appears to come from the outside with a background similar to your own gets taken in by people like Pelosi, and you hope against the odds that she will remain true to her ideals, but you know that so many before her did not. After all, at one point Pelosi herself was fighting for the freedom of the internet, yet look at her now.
At some point, you get tired of putting hope into the good ones. You get frustrated every time they seem to make progress only to be struck down. You get sick of seeing them naively fall for the notion that their colleagues are as genuine as they are.
At some point, you just find it easier, both for the sake of conversation but also your own peace of mind, to wrap it all up into the same package of “they’re all bad” and just stop wasting your emotional energy on it.
Or maybe that’s just me.