Alternate History: Robert Capa on D-Day (2019)
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: Alternate History: Robert Capa on D-Day (2019)
#2[deleted]
Re: Alternate History: Robert Capa on D-Day (2019)
#3A fascinating read. I was unfamiliar with the story of Capa, and found this Wikipedia article [0] on the "surviving" photographs to be interesting in that it mentions the fact that recent research has called into question the legitimacy of the overall story.
Re: Alternate History: Robert Capa on D-Day (2019)
#4Fantastic read, thank you for sharing!
Re: Alternate History: Robert Capa on D-Day (2019)
#5"In Scotland, there is at least one sheep, at least one side of which appears to be black from here some of the time."
It would be practically impossible in the 1940s to have faked the photographs but it's not difficult at all to misrepresent what they are photographs of, the circumstances in which they were taken, and how they came to be available.
Facts are true, and we should rightly ridicule people who insist otherwise, but the interpretation of those facts is subtle and subject to much mischief.
Most of the WW2 photographs I've spent time looking at were subject to an altogether more scientific consideration of this problem. They're aerial reconnaissance photos, so, hopefully they're pictures of something the enemy doesn't want you to know about, captured at great risk by expert pilots in unarmed aeroplanes (a camera plus film goes where the guns would otherwise fit in the plane). But in this case the answer to the question "What is actually captured in this photograph?" is known only to the enemy who've no intention of telling you, so you have to guess and you'd better guess right.
For example, suppose you've never seen a modern rocket. You've seen the powder-filled devices of course - still popular today as fireworks and sometimes for simple amateur rocketry (for beginners or children) but never a liquid fuelled rocket. Now, somebody shows you a photo with scale of a prototype German V-2 rocket and they propose this is a rocket, one of Hitler's vengeance weapons, with a range of perhaps 200 miles. It'd be so fast you can't hope to intercept or avoid it, once launched it is unstoppable. We must do everything possible to destroy them first, right? But on the other hand, whoever heard of a rocket with such ludicrous range - maybe it's a hoax, intended to do nothing more than divert Allied bombing away from valuable fuel and real military targets...
Re: Alternate History: Robert Capa on D-Day (2019)
#6Despite being uninterested in Capa, much less what stories he might have told, I was fascinated by the process described by the author to try to figure out what really happened. It was like a write up of diagnosing a tricky bug from logs and core dumps, or of tracking an intruder or other computer security issue.
Re: Alternate History: Robert Capa on D-Day (2019)
#7Despite being uninterested in Capa, much less what stories he might have told, I was fascinated by the process described by the author to try to figure out what really happened. It was like a write up of diagnosing a tricky bug from logs and core dumps, or of tracking an intruder or other computer security issue.
Clicking through to the more detailed blogs was quite the unexpected rabbithole.
Re: Alternate History: Robert Capa on D-Day (2019)
#8Fascinating story of how the “fog of war” can obscure the facts,
whether intended or not. Capa presumably had Life magazine as
a client or employer, they sent him to get photos of the landing,
on a tight deadline. Capa went, got photos, came back with his
film, and some of the shots he got were delivered and printed, on deadline.
I see his actions and decisions as professional photo-journalism, and see the entire fabulous confection of misinformation, decoration, confusion, blame, and apparently outright lies as a classic coverup of misinformation - once the fable is public, all involved either have to go along, or to contradict it: “When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.”
Does Capa share blame? Of course. But so do a dozen or more others who embellished, invented, and went along with the story. Should he have stayed on the beach, or with the command group and gotten more shots? Not if he wanted to get the shots he went for published on deadline.
Re: Alternate History: Robert Capa on D-Day (2019)
#9To me most significant is that the soldiers in the pic described as sheltering from gunfire behind a tank-trap thing were really combat engineers fixing to blow it up so equipment could be moved ashore faster.
Re: Alternate History: Robert Capa on D-Day (2019)
#10Fascinating story of how the “fog of war” can obscure the facts, whether intended or not. Capa presumably had Life magazine as a client or employer, they sent him to get photos of the landing, on a tight deadline. Capa went, got photos, came back with his film, and some of the shots he got were delivered and printed, on deadline. I see his actions and decisions as professional photo-journalism, and see the entire fab…
This little incident has now tainted his entire oeuvre. The truth was fine, there was no need for all the fiction. When you work in journalism your reputation is everything.
EDIT: Reading much further into the rabbit hole there remains the possibility that there were more photos that were censored by the British government and that the players involved were fed a (weak) cover story that they were then sworn to uphold. I've had military relatives with cover stories, so it's not impossible.