Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Software you hate but can't replace?

news.ycombinator.com

61–70 of 328 posts

Re: Ask HN: Software you hate but can't replace?

#61
post #25

Jira, for sure, and it seems hard to run away from, almost everyone use it It seems like the only alternative is to fund my own startup, with me as a sole shareholder, just to forbid Jira forever

I know Jira is difficult to get rid of once it is entrenched, but I’ve found Shortcut to be a great alternative.

https://shortcut.com

Re: Ask HN: Software you hate but can't replace?

#62
post #60
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Out of interest what do you not like about the whatsapp app? The core functionality seems pretty solid to me.

Lack of granular settings for notifications, wonky integration with the desktop client, groups, your id is your phone number. There isn't much that's wrong per se, but when compared to e.g. Telegram it's much worse.

There are very good reasons why your I'd is your phone number

Re: Ask HN: Software you hate but can't replace?

#63
post #38
post #25

Jira, for sure, and it seems hard to run away from, almost everyone use it It seems like the only alternative is to fund my own startup, with me as a sole shareholder, just to forbid Jira forever

What about gitlab ? Why wouldn't that be an alternative ?

The reason parent poster can’t replace Jira isn’t that there aren’t alternatives, but because a large part of the corporate world has decided that Jira is the best issue tracker because it has the most bells and whistles; it supports the SCRUM / Kanban / whatnot style workflows.

Also, it is not that great.

Re: Ask HN: Software you hate but can't replace?

#64
post #12

Whatsapp. It's a garbage app, made by a garbage company running like garbage on a garbage protocol. There is no realistic alternative because friends and family expect you to have it.

Huh. What do you specifically not like about it? I personally think it's one of the good ones: it's simple, it works and the developers are careful about feature bloat. It sucks less than anything managed by their parent company.

Re: Ask HN: Software you hate but can't replace?

#65
post #12

Whatsapp. It's a garbage app, made by a garbage company running like garbage on a garbage protocol. There is no realistic alternative because friends and family expect you to have it.

I quit Facebook in the latter half of the 2000's. Some of my family and friends suddenly stopped inviting me to things. I think anyone you lose because they have to send you a text message or email instead of a facebook invite/whatsapp message isn't really worth having as a friend. Especially if the reason you ditch Whatsapp is for ethical/moral reasons.

I admire your steadfast adherence to your principles, but as far as I'm personally concerned, there's no way it's a +EV play to be somewhat of a PITA to everyone else, on the basis of a position that would be percieved on the other end somewhat like "weird computer man yells at cellphone software".

Re: Ask HN: Software you hate but can't replace?

#66
post #25

Jira, for sure, and it seems hard to run away from, almost everyone use it It seems like the only alternative is to fund my own startup, with me as a sole shareholder, just to forbid Jira forever

Non-cloud Jira as a workflow manager is pretty good. It’s intuitive, powerful, quite fast (again, on-premises version only). But my current company uses the cloud version as an agile project management tool, and it’s awful just because it is soooo slow. And they keep changing the UI, sometimes with good ideas, sometimes not, but because it is so slow nobody wants to use it to update their progress. For example I update my times once a month because it’s an awful experience, and just use a spreadsheet the rest of the time.

Re: Ask HN: Software you hate but can't replace?

#67
Every website with cookie tracking. Which is every website.

Anything electron: massive hog of resources and will never be rewritten on a nonbloated platform.

Every single package manager and scheme still seems fundamentally broken and are bad compromises. But there's no money in fixing it so it will always be broken. I salute people doing the thankless work of packaging OSS and language libraries. You are fighting the good fight, even if it is a losing war.

Any and all OTP (time suck, blocks automation, debatable gain over "good passwords").

IDEs (every IDE becomes an intense love/hate relationship... Intellij is dragging to a halt on a couple "medium sized" projects... but what would I replace it with? Eclipse hahahahahaha?)

Javascript: still an awful language, even with a ton of improvements and typed options. May webassembly kill it, although webassembly is probably another google trojan horse to control the web.

Java: should stop "improving" itself and just work on the JVM and migrating people to Kotlin/Scala/Groovy/Clojure.

G Suite (well, it's better than outlook, but spying and the sword of Damocles with getting locked out with no recourse)

Microsoft Windows (still have an iron grip on games, I hate everything else about it since Windows 7), although a glimmer of hope is that it does eventually have a real unix core.

Bash: the number of stackoverflow searches per line of code whenever I have to write bash is like 5:1, as in five stackoverflow searches per line of code written. But what options do you have? Perl is dying, fish/zsh isn't ubiquitous, etc.

Installing any software written in python will probably fail, or worse, break all my other python apps. Example: AwsCli

AwsCli: again, stackoverflow searches to line of code/command ratio is terrible. options aren't well documented, responses aren't documented or well-exampled, error codes change between releases (seriously, HOW MANY DIFFERENT error messages can expired credentials result in?)

Aws: please someone start beating these people. Oh, the options are google and microsoft. Oh well.

OH! The AWS CONSOLE: What a piece of shit. How much money does AWS make every minute? Basically enough to actually fund a team for this? This is for ec2/secgrps/r53 aka the bread and butter. And they DID rewrite it, and managed to make it FAR WORSE. Performance is awful. Screens refresh and move items as you try to click on things. Do I have a choice for adhoc stuff? Oh the cli? See above.

Re: Ask HN: Software you hate but can't replace?

#70
For me it’s Azure DevOps.

We’re required to use it for the project I’m working on.

Some things I hate:

* Project backlog is a mess UI-wise. Lots of fields, with little to no explanation of what they drive. Generally a bad UI for working with stories.

* Reviewing large pull requests is very laggy performance-wise.

* Compare branches is broken - I have to start to create a PR, then cancel it, if I just want to compare two branches.

* Release pipeline (not build pipeline) does not allow yaml definition, so you are expected to configure it by point and click, true to form for Microsoft.

* Logging in - I have to bookmark it because there doesn’t seem to be a good direct URL to navigate directly to my repo (as opposed to like a GitHub repo for example). Also the confusing branding with “Azure” probably contributes to this as well.

There are probably more things, but these are some that come to mind right away.

Post reply on HN