Live data from Hacker News

Building a modern home in the woods

johnnyrodgers.is

471–480 of 508 posts

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#471
post #298

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not defending the other design choices, but there are places in snowy mountain areas where (almost) flat roofs are common [0]. [0] https://www.davos.ch/en/information/portrait-image/storybook...

Seems like the flat roofs in Davos were a conscious decision to safeguard against avalanches.

From the link: >" In order to guard against dangerous avalanches in snow-covered Davos, the houses were covered with flat roofs."

I wish they had detailed how flat roofs guards against an avalanche? What is the logic/physics at work there?

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#472
post #445

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this is obviously awesome, I just want to ask you if you see the idea of a 50-year-old tractor harmonizing with the idea of an ultra modern sustainable home and energy source?

TBH, sustainability is a byproduct rather than the goal. Plus, the tractor is definitely an occasional use tool. Now I think about it, I suspect a modern new tractor would take a very long time to pay off its embedded energy with the level of use it would see here. And my old tractor cost €3k. A new one would cost €30-60k. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Understandable!

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#473
Building a house is an incredible feat, the caveats of it are hard to understand for the casual bystander. There's a lot of comments here criticizing this project based on personal preferences, it's great that you managed to create something you are satisfied with!

My experience from building our first, and so far only, house are quite different. Having a limited budget (unlike what the blog post let you believe) was extremely stressful due to a large number of economical factors hard to foresee as a novice developer.

Land development comes with so many gotchas and bills needs to be paid, else, the build stops. Groundwork are most important and the economical impact will be great. We also had the romanticised view of "minimal site disruption", and modeled the house for it. In the end, the result was inevitable "site disruption" anyway. Make choices based on what you want, not based on whats there, the site will be so different anyway, it might be better to "create a new one" from start.

I can relate to the post. It took us 5 years from buying land, design grandios, re design more down to earth, permits, sourcing materials and finding-, firing-, re-hiring- local contractors, digging and building, until we finally where finished with the body and interior of a house. The sheer effort in doing this is astounding. We live in a beautiful one of kind house as a result. The one of kind also brings problems; Flat roof, Shu shogiban facade, oiled hardwood floors, limestone, large fixed windows, mosaic tiles. We have it all; great to look at and too feel, not so great when salt from outside makes stains on limestone, dogs make large pee stains on oiled floors, windows unreachable to be cleaned, tiles collecting dirt and open floor plans supporting sound travel more than we could previously understand.

In retrospect, it's very easy to make the wrong decisions, how ever prepared you previously thought you were, as new decisions needs to be made a la minute onsite, all the time.

The author seems well read about the technical part of their house, I cant help but feel they where overrun by contractors deciding what and what not should be installed. It is a shame they could not find a solution the geothermal heating. Nothing is said about ventilation or insulation. Not much feels "modern" to this build except the shape of it.

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#474
post #426

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's a cashflow vs capital thing. I'm in a similar situation - my wife and I aren't making much money at the moment, but our condo increased in value by so much that we were able to buy a million-dollar property. Granted it would have been a 300k property about ten years ago, but here we are. And due to the condo sale and the magic of financing, we have about 100k leftover to spend on renovating it and making…

Assuming, of course, that neither of you lose your income for the next 30+ years ...

Well, there are backup plans :)

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#475

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Space heaters are incredibly inefficient, though. You could almost heat the whole house with the same energy using a heat pump.

I mean, technically they're 100% efficient (as are computers). Heat pumps are limited by how cold and humid it is outside. The coils freeze up and they have to cycle to melt it off. It's not particularly cold in Vancouver but it is definitely humid. I'm not sure where the triple point is.

100% efficient is extremely inefficient for electric heating. A good modern air source heat pump has far above 100% efficiency in all but the coldest climates and a ground source heat pump has far above 100% efficiency in essentially any climate.

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#476

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The amount of cognitive dissonance required to say "we want to limit impact" on one hand, and to run a 400Amp electrical connection to heat your hot tub and pool in Canada, is staggering.

The lack of self awareness of people is staggering. How is it even possible to be this blind to it?

Their contractor talked them into building it without a fixed budget. That's a pretty good financial incentive to just say "can do!" to every suggestion the owner makes.

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#477
post #349
post #326

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I also did. Another ridiculous thing was that the article initially claimed no fossil fuels, but the one thing they couldn't live without was wood-burning fireplaces. I mean don't they both generate large amounts of carbon dioxide?

Wood is not a fossil fuel unless you’re burning petrified wood or coal (and somehow calling that wood). Fossil fuels are from carbon sources taken out of the normal carbon cycle (aka buried generally)

I understand wood is not a fossil fuel. But doesn't burning wood have the same environmental effect as burning fossil fuel? They both produce large amounts of CO2 and generate heat. If you didn't burn that wood, those would still be trees capturing CO2 from the atmosphere. So they didn't really achieve anything, did they?

(This is way outside of my expertise so I appreciate if you tell me what's wrong with my logic.)

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#478

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, I'm also looking at buying a house in California, but I too am afraid to buy a home anywhere that could realistically burn in the next 10-30 years. It's a shame since it rules out many of the best (and more affordable) areas of the state.

Some of this may be obvious (especially after you read it) so I apologize if this comment is unhelpful... The fires typically start in open spaces, so if your house is right next to open space, you're at a high risk of fire (and this is basically how your fire insurance rates are determined). Your best protection against fire is other houses. If the fire has to burn through 500 other houses to reach yours, chances ar…

I'd love to see a source for these statements, because it directly contradicts what I've seen in the Fire Smart BC (https://firesmartbc.ca/) materials.

I won't claim to be an expert, but am a local volunteer firefighter who has gone through some wildfire training. Forest fires create their own weather, including winds that drive burning embers ahead of the blaze, raining firebrands all over everything. Having numerous houses between the fire and your place just means the firefighters are already busy. The response to this is a combination of building material selection and landscaping.

Basically, you want to keep a 10m zone around your house as free of flammable materials as possible, and try to thin things out beyond this priority zone. Don't use bark mulch in the flower beds beside the house, and don't run that wooden fence right up to the house. Clean your eaves troughs of dead leaves. Wherever leaves and junk collect from the wind, burning embers will too.

I also have a couple of these mounted at the peak ends at my roof, with hoses I can connect and leave if needed: https://waspwildfire.com/products/gutter-mount-sprinkler-sys...

A department colleague used to fly fire suppression missions all summer long. He was able to spot the fire-smart places easily, because the massive fires appeared to "go around", and the homes were still there.

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#480

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That area is almost exclusively hydroelectric power.

Er, which area is that? NH is almost entirely nuclear from the Seabrook site.

I just skimmed the article, but I thought it said it was in BC.
Post reply on HN