Earlier quoted context omitted.
The other other difference is that iPad, iPod, iPhone, etc. actually describe their eponymous products ... iPhone? Sure. iPad? Maybe. iPod? Definitely not. It only seems that way because the iPod dominated the product category so strongly as to become synonymous with "portable digital music player."
Huh? The iPad is pad-shaped and "pad" is a commonly-understood noun in the tech world to refer to these devices. Same thing for iPod. It's pod-shaped (or was when it was introduced) and it's a pretty simple mental leap to classify this "pod" as a thing that you put your music "into". By stark contrast, "Qwikster" has absolutely no mental, cultural or conceptual link to the product or service it describes. It's worthl…
Not saying I like "Qwikster," but it's just not the case that the word "iPod" sounded like a music player before Apple made it famous.