Live data from Hacker News

Building a modern home in the woods

johnnyrodgers.is

301–310 of 508 posts

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are there forest fires as far north as Vancouver? It gets wet & cold up there. I though forest fires was mostly a California problem.

Oh yes, yes there are. Millions of hectares burn down every year: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_British_Columbia_wildfire... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_British_Columbia_wildfire... Last year an entire town disappeared: https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-sept-7-2...

Dang, what makes the west coast so prone to burning? I've lived on the east coast all my life and have never encountered a wild fire. The biggest fires we get are ~1000 acres[1], and easily contained.

[1] https://www.providencejournal.com/story/news/2021/05/17/larg...

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#302
post #278

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know, but it's beautiful. Maybe because of the ratios, maybe because it looks so intentional, it relaxes me. At the same time, I find these boxes horrible: https://nlc.p3k.hu/uploads/2019/07/ferencvarosi-helytortenet...

I wonder why people always post commieblocks photographed in a cloudy day in the winter. Usually also just after they were built so no trees yet. In reality that's how they look like (3 photos from 3 different districts in my city): https://spoldzielnialsm.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Obecni... https://d-art.ppstatic.pl/kadry/k/r/1/7e/04/5ed7c0329f818_o_... https://d-art.ppstatic.pl/kadry/k/r/1/79/a3/52da7c5466e91_o…

That was the first I've found.

Have you lived in these? I have and they are terrible places to live in. Parking spaces are ridiculously under planned, because workers used took a bus, but today most families own at least one car. These buildings are near their end of life since they weren't designed to last.

They are rather depressing to look at, but that's just me.

Soundproofing doesn't exists, moving walls is limited, inner height is claustrophobic.

I don't recommend to look up to these as any good. Maybe something to learn from.

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The source of the power is important. Are they kids if they care about the environment and pay for 400A service of renewable energy? Is there anyone in America or Canada who cares about the environment, who is not a kid by your standard? I know a bunch of people who claim to care about the environment, but they still eat meat, drive ICE cars, have children, use ridiculous amounts of power compared to the global avera…

They have a large propane generator to provide supplemental power when the 400A service isn't enough, such generators typically do not have advanced pollution control / carbon capture devices attached. This, combined with the design of the building, is evidence their care doesn't extend to action in this instance.

Sounds like a stop-gap measure, partially because building codes in the region didn't let them do what they really wanted to do:

> These are two areas where the BC building code, BC Hydro, and the construction industry lag behind more environmentally progressive regions. It’s our hope that as the technology and standards improve we’ll be able to eliminate propane from the mix and use a fully electric power base, much of it captured on site from our 11.6 kW array.

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#305
post #20

Ugh, the font doesn't scale when zooming, but the pictures do. The font does scale though when changing the container size. The font is massive on a monitor, terrible UX.

I loved the big font and overall UX, very minimalist and fit their theme it seems like.

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#306
post #278

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder why people always post commieblocks photographed in a cloudy day in the winter. Usually also just after they were built so no trees yet. In reality that's how they look like (3 photos from 3 different districts in my city): https://spoldzielnialsm.pl/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Obecni... https://d-art.ppstatic.pl/kadry/k/r/1/7e/04/5ed7c0329f818_o_... https://d-art.ppstatic.pl/kadry/k/r/1/79/a3/52da7c5466e91_o…

That was the first I've found. Have you lived in these? I have and they are terrible places to live in. Parking spaces are ridiculously under planned, because workers used took a bus, but today most families own at least one car. These buildings are near their end of life since they weren't designed to last. They are rather depressing to look at, but that's just me. Soundproofing doesn't exists, moving walls is limit…

> Have you lived in these?

Yes, in several different ones (when I was studying in Lublin I lived in 3 different places and later I rented a flat in Warsaw). I also lived in a detached house in countryside for most of my life and now I live in a reasonably modern neighborhood. I have a comparison.

> Parking spaces are ridiculously under planned, because workers used took a bus

That's the best feature of them. You can walk everywhere and cars are optional. Your kids can play with other kids without constant supervision. There's no vandalized underground passes stinking of piss where you get mugged. Old and disabled people can actually live there on their own. My wife's grandmother moved from a detached house to an old commieblock in a nearby city because of that - she doesn't drive anymore and living within walking distance of basically everything is a huge positive.

> These buildings are near their end of life since they weren't designed to last.

The ones in Poland are good to go for the next 30-50 years. It mostly depends on the rust protection for the concrete reinforcement. The cheapest ones with no protection are soon going to fall apart but we had very little of them. We built them with some galvanic protection. The ones with stainless steel are basically forever, but we had almost none of those.

> inner height is claustrophobic

250 cm. The same as in modern blocks in Poland (my current flat has 255 cm and that mostly depends on what kind of floor you have). It's the building code still. In fact the building code is much worse now - for example distances between blocks are several times smaller and there's no requirement to plan utilities in new neighborhoods. The end result is this:

https://static.polityka.pl/_resource/res/path/17/a1/17a1a73c...

Notice that it's all houses and parking, no utilities whatsoever. No public transport. Schools, shops, parks, health clinic - you need to drive through these tiny roads with your car to get to all of these. The end result is traffic jams and people sitting in their houses all day cause there's nowhere to go.

I will grant you soundproofing is worse, but even in modern blocks you can still hear your neighbors.

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#307
I have often dreamed about buying a vacation property. But when I seriously consider it, the idea of owning a second property stresses me out. There is the time and money investment to buy and maintain the property. Then there is the worry about a home being vacant most of the time - is a pipe going to burst or is someone going to break into it? And there is the guilt when you aren’t using it - would we realistically be able to visit even once per month?

Perhaps if I were significantly wealthier, the financial burden would be less and I could pay someone else to deal with any issues that arise. But for now, I feel like a second home would own me more than I own it.

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#308
Now imagine you're hiking in the woods and, all of a sudden, you reach a fence with a sign "PRIVATE PROPERTY NO TRESPASSING". Years go by and even more rich people build such homes in the woods. Now you're hiking in the woods, constantly passing through gravel roads leading to these properties and hearing traffic noise of a more major road where some cars from some of these houses went to fill the propane tank, buy food supplies or whatever.

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#309
I didn't build it but I live in a modern home in the woods. Just outside Toronto, surrounded by trees about 600 metres from the nearest road or house.

Modern as in built 5 years ago but not a 'modern' design like the article. A flat roof without eaves looks great but is impractical in Canada. As well as protecting the walls and footings from rain, eaves allow the low winter sun to shine through the windows, but keep out the high summer sun (trees block the low summer sun for us).

The only connected service we have is electricity, I'm planning to add a barn with solar panels on the roof so we may not need that soon.

Re: Building a modern home in the woods

#310
It's funny, at first glance of that top photo, I was sure I had seen it in a Blender tutorial video and it might even be the same (rendered) image). But no, I found it and although the layout is strikingly similar, it's not it.

Photo: https://cortex.persona.co/w/768/i/dee5ee05cc81d757e22f2338ab...

Render: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyXRBu7gn2o (0:36 in)

Post reply on HN