Live data from Hacker News

Facebook loses users for the first time

washingtonpost.com

171–180 of 1001 posts

Re: Facebook loses users for the first time

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It really gets me down when local/state emergency services etc. use it as their primary means of news/updates.

This has always irked me. Perhaps it's heavy handed, but I would love a law that (1) requires governments at all levels to use open-access websites (and radio, a local newspaper of record, &c.), and (2) requires services like Facebook to syndicate any news and updates.

The government should be creating their own services for both state and local governments to create websites. Instead, you got a 10,000 vendors charging outrageous prices that can't even get something like security right. Something like 18F would be awesome for these cities to start using. Unfortunately, politics is very corrupt so politicians are always going to want to pay a friend of a friend a million dollars to say that it was the vendors fault than to do something right, and the vendor will have some reason why it wasn't their fault. Rinse, recycle, repeat.

Re: Facebook loses users for the first time

#172
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

reddit used to be great until they pulled their great bait & switch, then added all kinds of authoritarian features. A brief history of reddit: > We want to democratize the traditional model by giving editorial control to the people who use the site, not those who run it. — Reddit FAQ 2005 > We've always benefited from a policy of not censoring content — u/kn0thing 2008 > A bastion of free speech on the World Wide We…

Reddit also stopped showing users the red background on their mod-removed comments. So when you're logged in it looks like your comment is live [1]. You can try it here [2]. I once tried looking through their archived code base to find when they made that change but couldn't decipher it. It's possible they never showed authors the red background at all. [1] https://imgur.com/E3bFvKh [2] https://www.reddit.com/r/CantS…

Reddit's been shadow banning forever. HN does it, too.

Re: Facebook loses users for the first time

#173
post #165

Literally all Zuckerberg has to do is not be the kind of person he is... his product itself did achieve success in that a huge number of people are using it, but then he had to prove himself to have no ethical standards

Why does it seem like I'm the only one who doesn't hate Zuckerberg? I'm genuinely confused. Can someone please explain this to me? I want to understand better.

Hate has always been popular, the punching bag just changes every few decades.

Re: Facebook loses users for the first time

#174

The fact of the matter is they still have close 2 billion active logins each day. Even if they have settled in matters of user acquisitions they haven't stopped harvesting increasing amounts of profit from each users. I would like to know how the statistics of revenue per user would be from this point on.

The revenue guidance for next quarter is not very great either, so given the user numbers ARPU is not growing

Re: Facebook loses users for the first time

#176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They finally monitized their products and customers to a breaking point. They run on engagement metrics without common sense or empathy to how fear and anger impact their user's wellbeing. I most definitely do not need or want a VR immersed version of that toxicity.

VR has nothing to do with facebook, at least at the moment. Just logging in with your facebook account doesn't mean its suddenly sucking all your life from you and piping it right to facebook. If you enjoy video games, its hands down the best way to game right now.

Which just KILLS me. They’re clearly on another level with the Oculus hardware, it just feels like a deal with the Devil that’s going to have a downside sooner or later and they’re trying to get you locked in before that.

Re: Facebook loses users for the first time

#178
post #10

When the metaverse actually launches they will skyrocket. They were smart to pivot early. Saying the 'metaverse' is on FB right now is similar to people selling acres on the Moon before anyone landed. FB is planting an imaginary flag on the 'metaverse' hoping they can technically catch up to their claims and capitalize on it.

> When the metaverse actually launches I think you need to define "metaverse". What is it, besides an ugly, much less functional Second Life? Who's launching it? What is it good for? Why would someone use it over...well, you have to define what it's good for before I can even ask that question.

I'm hoping for a better looking second life. If they can achieve that..

Re: Facebook loses users for the first time

#179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

reddit used to be great until they pulled their great bait & switch, then added all kinds of authoritarian features. A brief history of reddit: > We want to democratize the traditional model by giving editorial control to the people who use the site, not those who run it. — Reddit FAQ 2005 > We've always benefited from a policy of not censoring content — u/kn0thing 2008 > A bastion of free speech on the World Wide We…

reddit wouldn't be so bad re: free speech if you could ignore all of the non-sense, sadly they push it out to everyone by design

For a platform built on user contributions, they got too big (everybody ends up saying the same thing and getting downvoted as a result) and the moderation got hostile to the point you don’t WANT to contribute. Eventually you find the site that used to be fun, with lots of interesting things from interesting people…turned into a chore.

Re: Facebook loses users for the first time

#180

Facebook suspended the official washington state republican group multiple times for posts, they finally moved over to mewe. Facebook is a shadow of what it use to be after running off everyone.

Yes but lets not talk about fb's harming algorithm that amplifies dumb views
Post reply on HN