Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem was not swimsuits. It was any clothing that was relatively thin. Swimsuits was just an example. In any case why would we be required to don tinfoil suits every time we go to the airport?
I mean, the material has a bug that wasn't discovered until recently, so we fix the bug and re-deploy the material. It's that simple. Just embed some carbon fibers or something in the swim suit, there are tons of ways to block UV. It's like if your car seatbelts have a bug you issue a product recall. Same thing.
mmWave radar, you won't see it coming
111–120 of 192 posts
Re: mmWave radar, you won't see it coming
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
Right on. The whole "mm wave radar is detail rich but gives privacy" line is a contradiction. Any data that is detailed enough to be useful is detailed enough to be a privacy concern. While it might not be the same as leaking nude photos from someone's camera, radar data is something that needs to be carefully thought out. Radar data from a car can provide information about people's driving behavior even without loca…
> leaking nude photos from someone's camera whatever happened to that meme about common ccd cameras picking up uv images that make out details through eg swimsuits, but hopefully filtered and removed in software before making it to the images?
Many smartphones (used to?) exclude this filter on the selfie-camera because no matter how hot you think you might be, it's not going to be an issue.
If you want to check an IR remote for function, try with the selfie camera of your phone and not the normal one and make sure you are trying in a dark environment because the LED on the remote is going to be rather dim either way.
Re: mmWave radar, you won't see it coming
#113> Because mmWave radar doesn’t process visual light, what it sees is not personally identifiable. With machine learning improvements, identification and more are possible. From a 2021 paper on IEEE 802.11bf Wi-Fi Sensing, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.14918.pdf > Indeed, it has been shown that SENS-based classifiers can infer privacy-critical information such as keyboard typing, gesture recognition and activity tracking…
Re: mmWave radar, you won't see it coming
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why not just fix the swimsuits? Seems like a much more straightforward solution.
The problem was not swimsuits. It was any clothing that was relatively thin. Swimsuits was just an example. In any case why would we be required to don tinfoil suits every time we go to the airport?
Re: mmWave radar, you won't see it coming
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is also nonsense of course, the pornotron of TSA fame is mm wave radar.
The difference is the number of transmitters / receivers. TSA uses an array of them (from top to bottom) with narrow beams and they also rotate them and ask you to not move, so that effectively their number is considerably higher (ten of thousands), when reconstructing the image. Additionally, they use a higher frequency (160-400GHz), which additionally helps with resolution. See [1] and [2]. If we limit the number o…
Re: mmWave radar, you won't see it coming
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem was not swimsuits. It was any clothing that was relatively thin. Swimsuits was just an example. In any case why would we be required to don tinfoil suits every time we go to the airport?
I mean, the material has a bug that wasn't discovered until recently, so we fix the bug and re-deploy the material. It's that simple. Just embed some carbon fibers or something in the swim suit, there are tons of ways to block UV. It's like if your car seatbelts have a bug you issue a product recall. Same thing.
It is not the material that’s buggy, it’s new technology which can look under clothes and damage privacy that’s the problem.
Re: mmWave radar, you won't see it coming
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
You don't need to identify a face; you can identify people by Gait. If you can resolve something as big as a leg you've got enough, as long as you have it over 10 seconds or so.
It's odd that people care so much about technology "identifying them" when they have cell phones in their pocket and license plates on their car. There's not much of your daily life left after that, but I suppose it makes them feel good to imagine they're important enough to be tracked.
It has become almost impossible to participate in society, without every aspect of your life being recorded in some way.
My Bank sells my transaction data to third parties to track my credit history and sell advertizing - they do this without my consent, or rather if I disagree, they will not have me as a customer. I could switch banks but it's basically the same everywhere. All I wanted was a place to store and transfer money.
My phone company sells my location and call data the government and to marketing companies - they do this without my consent, or rather if I disagree, they will not have me as a customer. I could switch providers but it's the same everywhere. What I actually wanted was to be able to make phone calls and have data connectivity on the go.
My ISP sells which websites I visit to marketing companies - they do this without my consent, or rather if I disagree, they will not have me as a customer. I could switch ISPs but it's basically the same everywhere. All I wanted was to have data connectivity at my home.
My airline sells my flight data to the government. They do this without my consent. There is no alternative. I just wanted to visit some relatives.
The government tracks all my phone calls. They do this without my consent. There is no alternative. I just wanted to call my friends.
The government tracks where and when and whom I send emails. They do this without my consent. There is no alternative. I just needed to communicate for my business.
When I go out in public, my image is records by a multitude of cameras, by a multitude of actors. They do this without my consent. There is no alternative.
My licenceplates are scanned, depending on my locality, more or less regularily. What I wanted was to make going around a bit easier over longer distances. There is no alternative.
My medical records are ... well there's something called HIPAA, but the reason it has to exist in the first place is that some seedy actors are trying to get their grubby little hands on this most private information of mine. I do not consent to this. I am sick. There is no alternative to medical care.
I go out in public and depending on where I go, cameras are being equipped with all sorts of biometric detection capabilities. All I wanted to go out for a drink, suddenly I am in some database.
I go online to browse the internet. No further explaination needed.
All I wanted was to have wifi connectivity at home. Some asshole has crammed functionality into the standard for wireless connectivity, that makes it possble to track where my body is. There is no alternative.
And so on and so on and so on.
All of these things taken together create an information asymetry. One by one they aren't neccessarily that terrible, but by accumulating all this information - for which there is constant pressure by the more authoritarian elements of our societies - creates a digital me, that absolutely has an effect on my day to day life.
Easiest example is my credit score, I am sure one can think up reasons to justify it's existance. But the point is, that this device exists as an incarnation just for me - without my consent at all. It's not that I need to be very important to have a credit score. I just have one by default.
It does not make me feel "important" to be tracked. It makes me feel oppressed. It's the opposite of important. Being treated like this, decisions being made about me by some usually invisible faces, makes me feel like cattle. I am being treated as a good that can be sold, and from which value can be extracted, in other ways than the exchange for goods and services for money. I am the commodity itself. By default I am presumed guilty, and evidence is being collected against me, even if I will never violate any law of society.
My right to live as a free interdependent member of society are being violated by the people who think they can use me and the data they can glean about me for whatever their purpose is - and they do this without even considering my consent.
Information asymetry enables control. It's the anti-thesis to freedom.
It has nothing to do with feeling "important" and the choice you are implying people have is not a free choice. It's forced.
Re: mmWave radar, you won't see it coming
#118"The promise of ambient computing is that technology gets out of the way while becoming more helpful at accomplishing what we want. It anticipates our needs by understanding the context of our environment and situation. It serves us, rather than us serving it. " This is the optimistic case. Perhaps more likely is that 'ambient' computing will smother us in surveillance, ads, 'nudges', restrictions (you seem tired or…
Re: mmWave radar, you won't see it coming
#119> "Consumer Technology Association (CTA) announced Ripple, an open API for developing general-purpose consumer radar systems" Why using the name of a cryptocurrency for something that has nothing to do with it??