Live data from Hacker News

Starlink Premium

starlink.com

111–120 of 223 posts

Re: Starlink Premium

#111

What used to be "by mid to late 2021" is now "late 2022" for my location. I'm not shelling out another $400 for nothing. In fact, this reminded me to cancel my pre-order. Thank you! $99 back in my pocket. Deliver scalable GA and I'll subscribe.

I wonder if Starlink will start prioritizing their premium customers. If someone is willing to pay 5x more, it seems like Starlink would want to get to them first.

Re: Starlink Premium

#112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have one and it's really great. Went from high latency 10mbps (calnet) to low latency 150mbps (starlink). Prior to calnet we had geostationary satellite which was unusably bad and would try to tether through Verizon but signal was very weak. It's life changing if you're in an area without other options (though it does suck it's taking a long time for people to get access).

Just curious. What is your avg ping for starlink? I'm looking forward to my future farmhouse and the ability to play ranked valorant on it.

I bought it for my in-laws in Placerville California for when I’m there so can’t easily check right now, but I recall 24-40ms typically closer to 24-30ms.

Probably good enough, biggest pain is finding a view without obstructions from trees.

Re: Starlink Premium

#113
$500/month for 350Mbps! What exactly is Elon been smoking?! Okay, it's mobile... given you have electricity, of course, but if you have electricity, won't you have other options as well?

Re: Starlink Premium

#114

Why would this have lower latency?

I'm not sure the site is claiming that. They claim 20-40ms latency for the premium plan and "as low as 20ms" for the regular plan. Real world latency on the system seems to be around 45-50ms. The section says "highER speed, low latency" [emphasis mine]. So the speed will be higher than regular Starlink, but the latency will be low just like regular Starlink.

Re: Starlink Premium

#116
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personally, pushing docker images to AWS

You're constantly pushing to ECR so much that it saturates a 40Mbps+ upload consistently 24/7? I fear for your bills, god speed.

> consistently 24/7

That part doesn’t seem to come anywhere from the previous conversation?

Re: Starlink Premium

#117

$500/month for 350Mbps! What exactly is Elon been smoking?! Okay, it's mobile... given you have electricity, of course, but if you have electricity, won't you have other options as well?

> but if you have electricity, won't you have other options as well?

No. There's a huge chunk of North America by area that does not have 100+mbit/sec broadband.

Most of those areas don't have huge population, but those who are there sometimes are there for good reasons.

Starlink is wonderful for those people.

There are a lot of people who have delusions that Starlink is going to have a significant impact on mainstream wireline broadband providers, which is absurd, but there's a lot of the world that still has nothing even close to what this service offers.

If (and this is a massive IF) they get the laser linking working it'll be huge for the aviation and marine worlds but even as is it's the best thing to happen to rural broadband service in years.

---

Personally I hope they get mobile service for RVs working soon, all I need to work is reliable low-latency internet access so if I can theoretically get it from anywhere in the country I am free.

Re: Starlink Premium

#118

$500 deposit, $2500 total cost for the dish, $500/mo for the service. Looks like it's targeting the enterprise market. The dish cost is probably closer to the actual value of the dish. The original dish we bought for $500 I think I read actually cost closer to $3k for them to manufacture (I'm not an expert on this)? Regular service is $500 for a dish and $99 a month which is a great deal for 50-200mbps at pretty low…

Why does this seem aimed at the enterprise market (besides the price tag)? From what I've seen, Starlink uses CGNAT (carrier grade network address translation) so it's hard to handle incoming connections (given the lack of a public IP address). CGNAT seems like it would be a problem for enterprise customers. Would this be enterprises in cities where they'd be looking for a backup for a wired connection? I know that a lot of companies have wireless back-ups for their wired connection so I'm not sure that Starlink would be a better enterprise option for them.

The question in my head is whether Starlink is going to slow down their $100-tier signups if they start seeing enough $500-tier signups. People have been waiting for years to get Starlink. If they start getting lots of $500-tier interest, it seems like they'd prioritize those users for new signups.

Re: Starlink Premium

#119

$500/month for 350Mbps! What exactly is Elon been smoking?! Okay, it's mobile... given you have electricity, of course, but if you have electricity, won't you have other options as well?

I pay $700/mn for 200/200mbs fiber, in an rural area where 10/1mbs DSL is the only other option. Seems like it’s competitive to me.

Re: Starlink Premium

#120
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Over two years ago I emailed them about "sailing" starlink and actually got a decent reply back about it but have never seen anything else about it.

Why even write that if you aren't going to say what their response was?

Uh, it was obviously, "We don't do that yet."

Otherwise he'd have something about it.

Post reply on HN