Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also many pointing out that the notion that avoiding any consumption of alcohol is a ridiculous notion, as implied by the article, given that it's a common component of many foods.
Are you talking about trace amounts though. Or something that might add up to say a unit per week?
On reflection, I think the original study intended to say that "no amount of alcohol improves health". This is a different conclusion from "any amount of alcohol degrades health", which is how it has understood by many commentators.
It's quite possible for low alcohol consumption to have no effect on health, while also concluding it doesn't improve health.