Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a beautiful song by Vienna Teng called The Hymn of Acxiom[1][2] that covers this nicely. It's in the form of a hymn sung by the data collecting machine itself. It starts off like a message of love and reassurance, but the reassurance unravels as it goes on, until finally we reach the double meaning of it all: "Embrace you for all you’re/your worth" Somebody hears you You know that inside Someone is learning t…
This is one of the strangest and most amazing art pieces I've experienced. Perfectly captures our time, both in technology used to produce the song and the meaning of all the words
I got an FBI record at age 11 from dabbling in cryptography (2015)
351–360 of 373 posts
Re: I got an FBI record at age 11 from dabbling in cryptography (2015)
#352Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was in dire need of an Cat 5 cable a few years ago and went to Walmart to get one. Until this point I had always made my own cables, so when I saw the price ($40ish) I was floored. Unfortunately, I had to buy it anyway. As I was checking out I had that cable and a small bag of beef jerky. The cashier wasn’t paying attention and didn’t engage with me at all. She scanned the beef jerky and moved the cable across the…
You just stole it. I don’t see how this is even a grey area. Can you walk me through the thinking of “the cashier touched it, so now it’s mine?”
As for my thinking, it was impulsive, I was a fresh grad and didn't have much money, I was upset about the price, I thought the cashier was being rude by completely ignoring me. I felt like I attempted to engage with the process of buying the cable in the correct way and the process broke down in my favor. I was not going to go out of my way to fix it.
Again, none of that makes it the right thing to do. I wouldn't have considered walking in and stuffing it into my pocket, but feeling like I did my best I shrugged my shoulders and went on with my day.
Re: I got an FBI record at age 11 from dabbling in cryptography (2015)
#353Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's definitely a balance to be had... Kids don't generally have those rights because they have far too little life experience to judge the effects of associating with people. Adults have seen the life paths of those around them and observed where certain directions can lead. So, parents look out for their kids. Sometimes the parents just have poor judgement, heh
Adults have seen the life paths of those around them and observed where certain directions can lead. So, parents look out for their kids. Sometimes the parents just have poor judgement, heh That last bit is the issue. DO you really think a racist parent is going to allow a child to date somone that looks different - or a devout catholic is realistically going to allow their child to enter a same-sex relationship?
Re: I got an FBI record at age 11 from dabbling in cryptography (2015)
#354Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I got one girl's login that actually worked, which scared the shit out of me, and I deleted the program. (I really wanted to tell her that "emma" is not a good password, but I thought it wouldn't turn out well for me. With all due respect for HN policy of nuanced, Intelligent debate. "Wimp"
Did you ever had the courage to tell, that you lacked courage, once?
Wimping out is par for the course.
Re: I got an FBI record at age 11 from dabbling in cryptography (2015)
#355Quoted post unavailable.
Please don't start nationalistic flamewars on HN. They're tedious, repetitive, and nasty—just what we don't want here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Re: I got an FBI record at age 11 from dabbling in cryptography (2015)
#356This story (assuming it's true) should serve as an excellent example of why you need privacy even if you think that you don't. In peace time the NSA is only looking for "terrorist" and leaves everyone alone, but in case of war they would start creating lists for any and everything. All it takes is one "tough" agent trusting their gut feeling/algorithm based on your browsing history and shopping habits to put a target…
The "if there is any truth to it" remark was unnecessary. The author was very well known on the net when it was a much smaller place (the old Usenet days), and implying that he made it up is, to say the least, impolite. His Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Earnest
Re: I got an FBI record at age 11 from dabbling in cryptography (2015)
#357Earlier quoted context omitted.
Those Dutch who don't wear helmets do it because they're idiots, it's as simple as that. Any fall - even if you're standing with your legs on the ground - on a bike can break your skull. You try to avoid a dog or a ball and pull the front brake instead of both - boom broken skull. It's just plain dumb.
Pulling the front or back brakes makes almost no difference at normal speeds (≤15 km/h), and even if it did you can't just say "emergency stop equals broken skull". Many things can "break your skull", and there are many things you can do to improve safety. A whole bunch of years ago the then-UK government tried to promote "pedestrian helmets". No doubt this improved safety, but they were widely mocked. You need to dr…
The line is drawn around your bike. Don't ride it without a helmet.
Re: I got an FBI record at age 11 from dabbling in cryptography (2015)
#358Re: I got an FBI record at age 11 from dabbling in cryptography (2015)
#359Earlier quoted context omitted.
Those Dutch who don't wear helmets do it because they're idiots, it's as simple as that. Any fall - even if you're standing with your legs on the ground - on a bike can break your skull. You try to avoid a dog or a ball and pull the front brake instead of both - boom broken skull. It's just plain dumb.
Most Dutch bikes don't have front brakes to pull.
Re: I got an FBI record at age 11 from dabbling in cryptography (2015)
#360Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please don't start nationalistic flamewars on HN. They're tedious, repetitive, and nasty—just what we don't want here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
You have a very odd reading of my comment Dang, how is criticizing the FBI's abuse of power nationalistic?
It's not hard to criticize something like "the FBI's abuse of power" in thoughtful, substantive ways. Plenty of HN users do that while staying within the site guidelines. From a moderation perspective, the issue here isn't the FBI or any other divisive topic—it's simply comment quality.
"Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive."