Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

Post by badRNG » Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 10:59 AM UTC

lelanthran wrote: post #278

chrischen wrote: post #256

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I address that point that some woman want to wear burkas, just as some women don't want to show their boobs. Just because most men don't want to be tempted by seeing boobs, some women don't want to see boobs either. But regardless of men or women neither should be dictating how some woman want to show their body. Also, while I use the term "men" I really mean "any person that sexualizes a woman over their physical ap…

> But regardless of men or women neither should be dictating how some woman want to show their body. But, they can dictate how some men want to show their body? *shakes head* Firstly, you claimed that men are the problem, not that people who object are the problem. This new claim is a different claim. Secondly, whether you like it or not, women are more likely to complain of male nudity in a venue than men are to com…

Post by pseudalopex » Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 11:00 AM UTC

chrischen wrote: post #287

DaltonCoffee wrote: post #269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Idk, I think he's got you with the "sub out for dick" thing. We live in an (I hope) egalitarian democracy and what's acceptable to display is dictated by our polis. Can this same be said regarding women wearing burkas in Afghanistan. >most men don't want to be tempted by seeing boobs Just lol

A woman's boob is not equivalent to a man's penis. If anything, a vagina is is the equivalent to a penis, as both organs are used as part of sex. A boob is not normally used as part of sex. That being said, if we all agree that no genders can show their sexual organs then that's fine. That's at least an equally applied rule. However the issue here is that some men, and some women too, find it bothers them to see boob…

Post by dsr_ » Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 11:02 AM UTC

jb1991 wrote: post #158

kstenerud wrote: post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the same thing . It's fighting against the stupid view that two lumps under your flesh are somehow evil and must be hidden away or punished somehow (but only if you're a woman), or that touching your crotch on television is an arrestable offence, or any other thing in that long list of stupidity. It's about having rights over your own body, such that you can say "You don't like what you see? Well too bad, becaus…

> Here's an interesting thought experiment: A man gets breast implants and then goes around topless like he did before. Can you imagine the chaos that ensues? The legal questions? The social commentary about "decency"? The traumatized children? Can you see the hypocracy? I’m curious if you are suggesting that is perfectly acceptable that, in a society that prohibits topless women from walking around, it would be perf…

Post by lkramer » Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 11:04 AM UTC

lvl100 wrote: post #261

chrischen wrote: post #193

For any Westerners here who seem to have a hard time understanding why this is wrong: Look at an even more women-oppressing culture such as that of Afghanistan under the Taliban. Women are required to cover their faces in public. Why? For "modesty." What it boils down to is that if women show their faces it could have a negative effect on men (sexual attraction). A lot of people where are shaming her for being essent…

Quoted post unavailable.

Post by pfortuny » Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 11:07 AM UTC