Live data from Hacker News

Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

twitter.com

211–220 of 579 posts

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

See: https://twitter.com/RealSexyCyborg/status/139660466709473690... There's more, but again, until/if I can explain it more fully, it's on me.

This explains nothing. I don't think you do yourself much favours here. Because there's a subculture of people like you, it's OK to be half naked in front of kids?

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#212
post #164

This HN title would really benefit from being a little more specific: "N.W. Demonetized on YouTube for Display of Inanimate Objects That Resemble Human Nudity".

"N.W." is much less specific than "Naomi Wu", and your title is too long for HN anyway.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Absolutely. And I'm free to call out the hypocrisy of that given their PR messaging about diversity and inclusion.

You're doing good work. Don't stop. We in America need more people to understand why Shenzhen works. We used to have cities like that in the US. (An automatic tool setter for the SYIL mill will make it more useful. Having to manually set each tool discourages you from using more than one tool per job. Automatic tool setters are cheap, while automatic tool changers are expensive. I've used a Tormach without a tool set…

>You're doing good work. Don't stop. We in America need more people to understand why Shenzhen works. We used to have cities like that in the US

Thank you

>An automatic tool setter for the SYIL mill will make it more useful. Having to manually set each tool discourages you from using more than one tool per job. Automatic tool setters are cheap, while automatic tool changers are expensive. I've used a Tormach without a tool setter, which means you spend too much time setting up.

Right?! I have to do something about a tool changer, my Carvera is so much easier that I use it 10x more.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#214
post #201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

> cherish, value and respect each other Nothing says "we value you" like demonetization. /s

What do you mean ?

The behaviour of each and every woman should be unquestionably praised and supported in order to support equality ?

This is preposterous.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#215

Youtube Alternatives : Centralized : Dailymotion, Bitchute, Rumble, DTube, Vimeo, Vidlii, DLive, Triller Decentralized : Odysee(LBRY), Peertube

+1 for a maker oriented Peertube instance.

https://tilvids.com seems relatively nice, do you have others in mind?

I haven't found a dedicated "maker" instance on https://joinpeertube.org/instances (apart from a specific https://video.ellijaymakerspace.org/), but I think it's an interesting idea.

Now I'm not sure whether it would be best to encourage each maker to have their own instance (complex to administrate, unless completely automated, but at least easier to migrate to another handler), followed by a maker-dedicated instance, or directly host everything on a centralized instance.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#216

For any Westerners here who seem to have a hard time understanding why this is wrong: Look at an even more women-oppressing culture such as that of Afghanistan under the Taliban. Women are required to cover their faces in public. Why? For "modesty." What it boils down to is that if women show their faces it could have a negative effect on men (sexual attraction). A lot of people where are shaming her for being essent…

I hear what you’re saying and I understand your points regarding men. At the same time, at least in the US, I think it’s important to acknowledge that a lot of judgmental criticism directed at women comes from other women.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#217
post #198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But who cares? We don’t have puritans or religious nutjobs doing it any more… now it’s Google, Facebook, and Amazon. A naked woman is only as big is a deal as you make her, just label content accurately and as long as nobody is getting hurt, let it be.

> puritans or religious nutjobs They absolutely are still active and doing write-in campaigns about this; that's where FOSTA/SESTA came from. The ability of evangelicals to sway elections by having a large number of people in a pulpit filter bubble is greater than that of tech in the US.

A Christian group Exodus Cry got Pornhub's payment processing capabilities revoked over involuntary porn hysteria.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#218

Sigh... while talented, she is constantly pushing the boundaries of taste and the YouTube TOS to gain subscribers. She pretends to be some women's rights activist when she's really just a purveyor of some weird type of titillation. Yes the algorithm is capricious, yes its arbitrary, and yes YouTube is evil. But she's clearly making a bust of herself naked. I'm sure if I put my balls on YouTube they'd be more than dem…

Youtube has a checkbox for not for kids and she points out that she checks this for all her videos.

If she is pointing this as an excuse, it just shows how ignorant and/or manipulative she is. This checkbox is not how she says it works. It doesn't mark video's unsuitable for children..

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#219

Sigh... while talented, she is constantly pushing the boundaries of taste and the YouTube TOS to gain subscribers. She pretends to be some women's rights activist when she's really just a purveyor of some weird type of titillation. Yes the algorithm is capricious, yes its arbitrary, and yes YouTube is evil. But she's clearly making a bust of herself naked. I'm sure if I put my balls on YouTube they'd be more than dem…

> She pretends to be some women's rights activist when she's really just a purveyor of some weird type of titillation.

fine, you win, i'll go look her up.

Re: Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

#220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Youtube has a checkbox for not for kids and she points out that she checks this for all her videos.

If she is pointing this as an excuse, it just shows how ignorant and/or manipulative she is. This checkbox is not how she says it works. It doesn't mark video's unsuitable for children..

there should be a way to do that.
Post reply on HN