Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube

Post by [deleted] » Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 6:30 AM UTC

solarmist wrote: post #14

SexyCyborg wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, it's a regular occurrence, not the whole channel yet. And technically it's "reduced monetization" but that works out to a 90% drop in income on those videos. And again, before all of HN jumps on me, yes I get why, and agree why, but no I'm not doing it for the reasons many of you think and will want to chastise me for. I really do just look like this. If it was just a matter of changing outfits like a normal fun…

Let me start with I completely support you and love your Twitter and videos. But this feels uncalled for. > Yelling at me that I have it coming because I'm a lying whore trying to cheat poor innocent simps out of their money isn't going to make it any easier to offer a complete backstory. No one’s said anything like that. From what I’ve seen, HN is generally pretty supportive and respectful of you, even if they disag…

Post by deltaonefour » Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 6:30 AM UTC

Barrin92 wrote: post #17

totony wrote: post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't it understandable that people want separate spaces for sexual and non sexual content? I wouldn't jump the gun on allowing sexualization everywhere since it can have pretty bad effects on some people. Now whether this is sexual or not is another matter.

Not really. Sexuality is and ought to be a normal part of human life and the repressed puritanism of US culture in particular is kind of awful. There's a distinction worth making between voyeurism and sexualizing others but when someone portrays themselves as they want to be seen I have no idea why that needs to be put in some sort of box. Because there ought to be nothing offensive about sex, which is just about the…

Post by somerando7 » Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 6:33 AM UTC

SexyCyborg wrote: post #6

oceanghost wrote: post #5

Sigh... while talented, she is constantly pushing the boundaries of taste and the YouTube TOS to gain subscribers. She pretends to be some women's rights activist when she's really just a purveyor of some weird type of titillation. Yes the algorithm is capricious, yes its arbitrary, and yes YouTube is evil. But she's clearly making a bust of herself naked. I'm sure if I put my balls on YouTube they'd be more than dem…

"She pretends to be some women's rights activist" I'm a mainland Chinese citizen with a high profile on Western Social Media, I can assure you I work very hard to make sure no one confuses me as a women's rights activist. Particularly not these days. "Yes the algorithm is capricious," Not the algorithm- all human moderation. "she's really just a purveyor of some weird type of titillation" Why not just have an Only Fa…

Post by aaomidi » Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 6:34 AM UTC

deltaonefour wrote: post #23

Barrin92 wrote: post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not really. Sexuality is and ought to be a normal part of human life and the repressed puritanism of US culture in particular is kind of awful. There's a distinction worth making between voyeurism and sexualizing others but when someone portrays themselves as they want to be seen I have no idea why that needs to be put in some sort of box. Because there ought to be nothing offensive about sex, which is just about the…

> repressed puritanism of US culture in particular is kind of awful. Have you seen other cultures? US culture is one of the LEAST repressed cultures.

Post by SexyCyborg » Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 6:38 AM UTC

dirtyid wrote: post #15

Wonder what the success rate for petitioning youtube as foreign national creators are. Alphabet goes out of the way to be support unfriendly and at the end of the day it's not even about clearer rules but incentivizing less support to save costs unless demonetization drama cause sufficiently bad PR. Content creators who has accumulated harassers over the years that are report happy are kind of screwed. Maybe extra sc…