Earlier quoted context omitted.
It probably happens more than you think. Organs are doled out based on a rating system as evaluated by a small review board In the case of ties, the question of who “deserves” the organ is relevant to the board members. Uncomfortable but true. Also doesn’t really apply here as this guy had a last ditch experimental operation. The family in the article just wanted revenge.
The organ board base their decision on likelihood that the receiver will benefit from the transplant (for a long time), so some habits that are medically relevant are taken into account: smoking, drinking, taking drugs, and when AIDS was a concern, having sex with people who might transmit it. All those also come a moral judgement so many people assumed that the board was making a moral judgement. They are not: havin…
Genuine ties do happen though, and at the end of the day the board is human.