Live data from Hacker News

Foobar2000

foobar2000.org

181–190 of 219 posts

Re: Foobar2000

#181

I've been using foobar2000 since the 90s. It plays music effortlessly, but I also love the extensive tagging and ripping functionality. Another plus is its interface skinning flexibility. There are recently made "modern" looking themes if that's your thing. I'm currently using Georgia[0]. [0] https://github.com/kbuffington/Georgia

It's initial release was 2002, not that it's a meaningful difference.

Re: Foobar2000

#182

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Music Forums (and 4chan) were amazing for discovery because you had people with extremely hard opinions arguing vociferously against others over which album was best or why such-and-such was awful. Music recommendations feels like somebody constantly prodding you with "oh don't like this? try this!" Perhaps it was the combative nature that made them so much fun.

I like https://everynoise.com to get started on discovery. It kinda replaced looking at tags on last.fm for me, it uses Spotify metadata.

This is amazing. Thanks for the link!

Re: Foobar2000

#183
post #32
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Foobar2000 was my favorite as well back in my Windows days. But on Linux I think cmus does a great job. What exactly does Foobar2000 have that cmus doesn't?

Windows -> foobar2000 Linux, Mac -> cmus

someone should really port cmus to use bubbletea/bubbles

https://github.com/charmbracelet/bubbletea

https://github.com/charmbracelet/bubbles

Re: Foobar2000

#184
post #34

I remember writing a Foobar2000 plugin to emulate the Winamp API so my mIRC song spam scripts still functioned. It was buggy as hell as I was still new to C++ programming and it eventually got added to a hard-coded blacklist in the app for causing stability issues. I ended up open sourcing it and it still lives on 19 year later, about three forks deep and a lot more stable and functional. The power of open source!

OMG, "writing a Foobar2000 plugin to emulate the Winamp API so my mIRC song spam scripts still functioned" is such a nostalgia packed sentence for those of us of a certain age. Some of the most fun I ever had was trying to make the utterly ridiculous mIRC script programming language do things it was not meant to do. Pretty sure I recall someone I know writing a primitive web server with it IIRC

there was an entire website (picwin.tk) devoted to demos (demoscene) and games doing some really wild shit

Re: Foobar2000

#185
post #126

I never found a browsing interface as good as Winamp's. Basically it had three panels, in order: Artists, Albums, Tracks (you could enable "Genre"/"Year"/... as well but I rarely did). So at any point, you could select an artist and see both their albums and tracks. Or you could select no artist and see all albums and all tracks. You could select an album there and see all tracks in that album. You could pick a track…

You're comparing Winamp's music library browser to non-library players, of course they'll come up short.

Itunes and MusicBee seem like they would fit your requirements.

Re: Foobar2000

#186
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wait a second, 4chan had a music section?

There were even decent releases made on /mu/. Specifically, never having been on 4chan myself, I've heard of that scene by the way of Loli Ripe—whose music is basically j-core a-la DJ Sharpnel, but with more breakcore. I only wish that they would better normalize the volume between tracks. IIRC there was also something vaporwave-related (predictably). (Dammit, this all was really long ago.)

> IIRC there was also something vaporwave-related (predictably).

/mu/ collaboratively produces albums all the time. I was present for and might have contributed to this one: https://millennialdreamcorp.bandcamp.com/album/drake-josh-jo...

Re: Foobar2000

#187
This is by far the best music player I've ever used, and I tried a bunch of them (on Windows, macOS, and Linux). I would love to go back to foobar2000 again, and I hope to someday. And while I hate Spotify with passion, I do see the practicality of streaming services like that.

Re: Foobar2000

#188
post #34

I remember writing a Foobar2000 plugin to emulate the Winamp API so my mIRC song spam scripts still functioned. It was buggy as hell as I was still new to C++ programming and it eventually got added to a hard-coded blacklist in the app for causing stability issues. I ended up open sourcing it and it still lives on 19 year later, about three forks deep and a lot more stable and functional. The power of open source!

Oh, man. That’s hilarious. I remember another guy getting blacklisted because he was writing plug-ins that mucked with the menu and whining because Pawlowski started changing the menu ids in every minor release out of spite.

I had my own learning experience when I accidentally deleted all my plugins’ sources and couldn’t recover it. That was an important lesson on the reason for backups and version control. I burned a ton of time on those plugins.

Re: Foobar2000

#189
Kinda strange to see all of the "OMG I remember this.. ".

Foobar2000 is still what I use to listen to my FLAC collection while on my desktop computers.

It's ability to let you do everything, rename, transcode, copy, tag, replaygain, etc is a throwback to when software respected your personal agency.

Re: Foobar2000

#190

I've been using foobar2000 since the 90s. It plays music effortlessly, but I also love the extensive tagging and ripping functionality. Another plus is its interface skinning flexibility. There are recently made "modern" looking themes if that's your thing. I'm currently using Georgia[0]. [0] https://github.com/kbuffington/Georgia

It's initial release was 2002, not that it's a meaningful difference.

Haha, thanks. Just more evidence that I'm getting old. It feels like I've been using it since I first touched a computer. But most likely I found my way from Winamp like most folks.
Post reply on HN