Live data from Hacker News

Foobar2000

foobar2000.org

91–100 of 219 posts

Re: Foobar2000

#91

Foobar is one of the greatest pieces of software ever and Linux music software only dreams it can be as good as Foobar.

gmusicbrowser (combined with Ex Falso for more extensive tagging) has replaced foobar2000 for me, and I _think_ that these days I like it even better than I ever liked foobar2000 - but maybe that's just the long years making my memories of its greatness somewhat hazy...

Re: Foobar2000

#94
I like Quodlibet, but I had to switch to Foobar2000 in my working laptop (Win10) because some library wasn't working properly.

On my personal laptop (PCLinuxOS), Quodlibet is working fine.

Both audio players are pretty bare bones until you start to customize them with their add-ons.

Re: Foobar2000

#95
post #57
post #39

Anyone know why there's never been a linux version?

deadbeef is a pretty good cross platform clone

It tries to, but isn't.

I use both foobar2k and deadbeef depending on which OS I'm booted at.

deadbeef is most blatantly missing a library; It has the playlists, but no library.

Re: Foobar2000

#96
I didn't use it, but it looks to me like one of the main draws of foobar2000 was library/metadata management. I've only ever used directories in the filesystem as a "library," and have used many players over the years (mainly moc, which I love, but which doesn't bring anything especially valuable to the table--I mainly just like the UI and out-of-box key commands).

Thus, to me, as an outsider, this whole conversation feels a bit like a cautionary tale about software/vendor lock-in.

Re: Foobar2000

#97
Foobar2000 and TotalCommander are the only pieces of software I ever regretted moving from the Windows ecosystem. Nothing I found on other platforms came even close to the level of functionality they provide for their respective classes.

Re: Foobar2000

#98

    I switched to FooBar2000 shortly after it was started.  IIRC it was mentioned in a /. thread and I enjoyed it right away.  At this stage the available extensions were almost non-existent but the framework for depth & breath was there and looked promising.

    It was also one of my favorite interactions with contact directly with the programmer.  At the time, there was some conflict in the forums with the developer about the distinction between "shuffle", and "random".  Whenever you played songs from your playlist with 'Random' selected the same songs would play in the same order.  I'd have a playlist containing over 100 songs and (for example) it would always play:    13, 72, 55, 31, 85, etc... until eventually restarted that order (without playing all songs in the playlist).

    The developer insisted the play order was random and he wouldn't fix it.  He claimed that people were looking for a 'shuffle' feature and they refused to create one.

  The interaction always reminded me of this strip:    https://xkcd.com/221/
Not long afterwards, I discovered Amarok from the KDE v3.5 days and stopped caring about Windows audio players.

Re: Foobar2000

#99
Ah yes, foobar2000 and IrfanView. The 2 tools that I'll likely never replace.

Been using them both for what seems like forever. Late 90s for IrfanView and foobar2000 since it came out, I remember switching to it from Winamp back in the day.

Given how many positive comments there are for this tool, I think it's safe to say efficiency is a primary factor when choosing desktop apps. It's hard to replace something that works great, opens instantly and uses practically no resources. I forgot what box I had back then but I'm pretty sure it was a Pentium III 700@933mhz CPU, it was super smooth back then too.

Re: Foobar2000

#100
post #3

Foobar2000 was such a golden age of music discovery (mostly through piracy forums) for me in my teens, used to spend hours upon hours customising it and posting the results on Hydrogen Audio while weird and wonderful music was downloading from yousendit, rapidshare, soulseek, and megaupload. Bands I now go see live and support through bandcamp now that I'm not poor! So much more exciting and engaging than fucking Spo…

Music Forums (and 4chan) were amazing for discovery because you had people with extremely hard opinions arguing vociferously against others over which album was best or why such-and-such was awful. Music recommendations feels like somebody constantly prodding you with "oh don't like this? try this!" Perhaps it was the combative nature that made them so much fun.

Wait a second, 4chan had a music section?
Post reply on HN