Live data from Hacker News

Nova by Panic

nova.app

31–40 of 267 posts

Re: Nova by Panic

#31
Highlighting support is bad:

> For the curious, Nova has built-in support for CoffeeScript, CSS, Diff, ERB, Haml, HTML, INI, JavaScript, JSON, JSX, Less, Lua, Markdown, Perl, PHP, Python, Ruby, Sass, SCSS, Smarty, SQL, TSX, TypeScript, XML, and YAML.

Youre supporting stuff like Diff and Haml, but not stuff like Go or Rust?

Re: Nova by Panic

#32
I don't understand why every editor these days come with a minimap, and many of them turn it on by default. I know Sublime introduced it but what does it do exactly? Why is everyone copying it? It just shows you the shapes of blocks of texts of a long file from ten meters away. It doesn't tell you what they are or what they do, or even how to get there. Every IDE since at least the early 2000s gave you an index or a tree menu or something for navigation, VS Code has a breadcrumb IN ADDITION TO the minimap, possibly because Microsoft realizes its gimmick nature. Why not just get rid of it to free up more screen real estate for actually useful things?

Re: Nova by Panic

#33

I used to have coda. I guess they renamed it Nova: https://panic.com/coda/ I wanted to love (Coda) it but it wasn't good enough for me to switch. This looks slick, but I work multi-platform so this while it looks great, if doesn't do linux I'm out. They even talk about the lack of cross platform in the copy. If I need speed I'll use Vim or emacs. For day to day I bought the JetBrains suite. For a pretty inovative com…

Worth noting Coda (for iOS / iPad) was discontinued in May 2021: https://panic.com/blog/the-future-of-code-editor/

(personally, I kept waiting for such a vision to make sense and ended up running Sublime Text on a Linux tablet pc instead)

Re: Nova by Panic

#34

I really wanted to like Nova. I paid for it (and used it) for a year. In the end, though... I switched back to VS Code. Native apps like this are much faster than such things, but I had too many use cases for the plugins. Kind of the same experience as Sublime Text. It's _really fast_, but I just rely too much on plugins when the experience requires something more than vim.

I had a similar experience, but -- possibly counter-intuitively! -- ended up going mostly all-in back on BBEdit 14 when it was released with LSP support which has proven to be a lot less, well, flaky than Nova. I like VS Code a lot and may yet return to it as my main coding editor if I go back to a big project, but BBEdit has always been my old warhorse when it comes to my technical writing because it's just such a S…

Sounds like we really did have a similar experience - Nova is _great_, but not what we need.

I have very specific and weird needs. For example, I need syntax highlighting for LaTeX, but in a non-mathematic-but-programmatic-control-of-layout way.

VS Code supports that, oddly enough. No other text editor does.

Re: Nova by Panic

#35
post #24

> "No-Fuss Analytics & Privacy Settings" I can't recall a time that analytics have ever made a "fuss" for me, but that's not why I dislike them :( I don't own a modern Mac, so I can't check the settings out myself, but that's the first thing I would look at after reading this in the features list. Looks great otherwise though, and it's cute how it rhymes with "Coda".

It's probably alluding to https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/getstarted/telemetry which isn't exactly straight forward.

Yeah, I’ve never given it much though for personal use, but I’ve used VS code in a professional setting with strict policies around stuff like that, and “fuss” is a good word to describe the steps to use VS Code in that environment.

Re: Nova by Panic

#36
post #12

I've admired Panic for the entirety of my career, they're always doing really nice work, and I'm glad they're still going strong in a time where native desktop apps aren't really the du jour.

Quoted post unavailable.

> but they don't do equity

If it's an independent business since 1997 the implication is they're not for sale, so equity wouldn't be likely to achieve any liquidity, hence relatively meaningless.

Re: Nova by Panic

#37
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

> but they don't do equity If it's an independent business since 1997 the implication is they're not for sale, so equity wouldn't be likely to achieve any liquidity, hence relatively meaningless.

This only follows for businesses that do not pay a dividend. Assuming Panic is profitable, equity could easily result in profit-sharing or dividends. Facilitating employee share sales would also allow employees to take on more or less Panic risk depending on their personal tolerance.

Other companies have done similar for decades/centuries.

Re: Nova by Panic

#38
I will reiterate my chief complaint with this: it should have just copied the VSCode extensions API from day one and relied on easier porting of them.

Re: Nova by Panic

#39
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> but they don't do equity If it's an independent business since 1997 the implication is they're not for sale, so equity wouldn't be likely to achieve any liquidity, hence relatively meaningless.

This only follows for businesses that do not pay a dividend. Assuming Panic is profitable, equity could easily result in profit-sharing or dividends. Facilitating employee share sales would also allow employees to take on more or less Panic risk depending on their personal tolerance. Other companies have done similar for decades/centuries.

they do profit-sharing bonuses it seems
Post reply on HN