Show HN: Create simple yet elegant Web Resumes for free
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: Show HN: Create simple yet elegant Web Resumes for free
#2Hey guys,
Author here. We've built a tool for professionals to create elegant web resumes. We would love to hear your thoughts on it :)
Have an amazing day!
Re: Show HN: Create simple yet elegant Web Resumes for free
#3Looks good. Smart to include ability to schedule a la Calendly. Don’t love the pricing. $40 “forever” isn’t as enticing as it sounds as you may be gone in a month.
Also, the paid version is for “Professionals”… who’s the free version for? I’d reconsider that language.
Re: Show HN: Create simple yet elegant Web Resumes for free
#4No post body was provided.
Re: Show HN: Create simple yet elegant Web Resumes for free
#5I like the design, pricing can be better. But very good overall.
Re: Show HN: Create simple yet elegant Web Resumes for free
#6How does it differ from https://jsonresume.org/
Re: Show HN: Create simple yet elegant Web Resumes for free
#7How does it differ from https://jsonresume.org/
Great open source alternative, with a CLI tool too..
I think I'll replace my LaTeX Pipeline with this.
Re: Show HN: Create simple yet elegant Web Resumes for free
#8How does it differ from https://jsonresume.org/
It looks way more elegant and modern to me
Re: Show HN: Create simple yet elegant Web Resumes for free
#9Looks good. Smart to include ability to schedule a la Calendly. Don’t love the pricing. $40 “forever” isn’t as enticing as it sounds as you may be gone in a month. Also, the paid version is for “Professionals”… who’s the free version for? I’d reconsider that language.
> Also, the paid version is for “Professionals”… who’s the free version for?
Hobbyist interviewees lol
Re: Show HN: Create simple yet elegant Web Resumes for free
#10Looks good. Smart to include ability to schedule a la Calendly. Don’t love the pricing. $40 “forever” isn’t as enticing as it sounds as you may be gone in a month. Also, the paid version is for “Professionals”… who’s the free version for? I’d reconsider that language.
Thank you for your feedback! :) Pricing is something we are still playing around with, I'll keep your point in mind. Also, what pricing do you think is justifiable?
> Also, the paid version is for “Professionals”… who’s the free version for? I’d reconsider that language. That's a good point, though our intent was to convey that PRO features are best suited to Basic features for Professionals.