Launch is for Amateurs: Focus on Building a Product & a Brand
bostinnovation.com
Launch is for Amateurs: Focus on Building a Product & a Brand
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: Launch is for Amateurs: Focus on Building a Product & a Brand
#2However, this post comes across as just a complaint against marketing in general. He says, "but marketers who busy themselves marketing can destroy value as readily as they create it" but doesn't lay out the case of how that happens. Nor does it explain why Johnny's push to launch is a bad thing.
I was hoping the post would articulate why "Johnny" is a "bad thing," because I have an instinctive feeling that the author is right, but unfortunately the explanation falls short.
Re: Launch is for Amateurs: Focus on Building a Product & a Brand
#3Of the dozens of trade shows I've been to, trade-show girls are good for one thing: Collecting contact info of horny guys.
The resulting lead lists had incredibly low signal-to-noise. Then again, I've never worked in the adult game arena.
Re: Launch is for Amateurs: Focus on Building a Product & a Brand
#4Building a company is more like watering a plant than birthing a baby. Emphasis on the Launch is built around the idea that there wasn't anything and then, poof, the business is fully formed and developed. Businesses are rarely, if ever, made like that, so building in those assumptions in your marketing and development process are going to start you down the wrong path from the start.
Re: Launch is for Amateurs: Focus on Building a Product & a Brand
#5Early Twitter was a barebones product, and their brand was the fail whale. Yet they skyrocketed starting with well-planned marketing at SXSW.
FriendFeed was a reliable, slick and sophisticated product. They relied on user advocates for their marketing. They did get bought by Facebook for $50MM, but never grew to more than a million users.
Re: Launch is for Amateurs: Focus on Building a Product & a Brand
#6I want this article to be true, but I don't think it is. Early Twitter was a barebones product, and their brand was the fail whale. Yet they skyrocketed starting with well-planned marketing at SXSW. FriendFeed was a reliable, slick and sophisticated product. They relied on user advocates for their marketing. They did get bought by Facebook for $50MM, but never grew to more than a million users.
All your examples are social networks that need a critical mass of users before there is any point. You can't have a social network without people.
For many products, the user experience doesn't depend on other users, so they don't need the same level of marketing.
Re: Launch is for Amateurs: Focus on Building a Product & a Brand
#7Re: Launch is for Amateurs: Focus on Building a Product & a Brand
#8"[Let] your product trickle out when you think it’s good enough to get people excited, then listening hard for excitement. If you hear some, figure out where it’s coming from, and do more of that"
(OP's emphasis)
Re: Launch is for Amateurs: Focus on Building a Product & a Brand
#9I like the sentiment of this post. I'm in a situation right now with our own Johnny and new products coming to market, and I fear he is staffing up for a big push at launch without actually thinking about adding value. However, this post comes across as just a complaint against marketing in general. He says, "but marketers who busy themselves marketing can destroy value as readily as they create it" but doesn't lay o…
Re: Launch is for Amateurs: Focus on Building a Product & a Brand
#10I think that the real point of the article launch is really not so good for amateurs -- though amateurs might want to wait for a big launch in order to release their product, which can be a bad idea.