Live data from Hacker News

FlyZolo – Youngest Woman Solo

flyzolo.com

51–53 of 53 posts

Re: FlyZolo – Youngest Woman Solo

#51
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's competitive in that people have to compete for funding. Sounds like academia. Of course you have to have money to begin with to train to be a pilot.

No, there isn't enough _total_ funding for it to be competitive.

I'm not sure I get what you're saying. I think that there is some funding in existence, and people can compete for it.

Re: FlyZolo – Youngest Woman Solo

#52

Perhaps I'm not as rich as everyone else on HN, but I feel like this is a frivolous game for rich kids. The entry bar here is being able to afford planes, flight lessons, airport fees, fuel, hotels, etc. more so than anything else. At 19, that means rich parents. I came out distinctly underwhelmed with the accomplishment, and overwhelmed by the self-congratulatory copy. (Yes: I do know the amount of time and effort r…

You don't need to be rich to make something like that. Any middle class family in USA or Europe can do that, they just need to go for a smaller house, not a second house for vacations or not so expensive cars. I have seen that, parents investing money on their children instead of on other things. It is their money they got working and they could do with it what they want. You are just envious. Flying gets cheaper ove…

... or maybe I'm living in a reality where the vast majority of people where I live are struggling with with rent and dreaming of home-ownership, or with their mortgage, and not buying second houses.

I'm not sure which reality you're living in, but it seems... disconnected.

Re: FlyZolo – Youngest Woman Solo

#53
post #20

Perhaps I'm not as rich as everyone else on HN, but I feel like this is a frivolous game for rich kids. The entry bar here is being able to afford planes, flight lessons, airport fees, fuel, hotels, etc. more so than anything else. At 19, that means rich parents. I came out distinctly underwhelmed with the accomplishment, and overwhelmed by the self-congratulatory copy. (Yes: I do know the amount of time and effort r…

So what? Yes people are richer, more gifted, more athletic than others. Can't we celebrate an achievement because not everyone can do it? All Olympic athletes have exceptional genetics and most people simply can't stand a chance no matter what they do. And most of them are not poor either, does it undermine the achievement? And it is not that much money. Clearly, it is not for the poor, but it is something achievable…

What makes it less impressive is the barrier to entry. What's amazing about being the fastest runner in the world is that most anyone can try, so to be the single fastest runner is a feat no one else the world over can accomplish. Flying an airplane across the world, while cool, is something limited to only wealthier people. Maybe you'd be able to do it, but you just can't afford to try. Not saying there isn't anything to it, it's just that it's something that even trying for is limited to a privileged few. And not to be overly cynical-- but add in concerns about global warming and fuel waste, and well it just can feel like wealthy people entertaining themselves with wasteful activities limited to the wealthy
Post reply on HN