Google+ Platform

Post by abraham » Thu, Sep 15, 2011, 9:09 PM UTC

bwblabs wrote: post #15

I get the feeling that Google has a new policy to NOT support IE9/8/7, like with their Chrome experiments ( http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2812503 ). Check the BrowserLab results: http://i.imgur.com/S6dQP.png I would say that there are two options: * They don't test their site in IE9 (nor 8/7/6) or they don't know/care. * They are actively doing this.. And I cannot believe the first..

Post by abraham » Thu, Sep 15, 2011, 10:21 PM UTC

bwblabs wrote: post #22

abraham wrote: post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

UPDATE: See grandchild. 1) http://developers.google.com/ is an internal server error. 2) I don't trust BrowserLab as not a single one of the browsers showed me https://developers.google.com/+/

1) I cannot verify that, all my tests are responding with a HTTP status 200. 2) Well of course I notices it with my IE9 first, but I thought that BrowserLab was a nicer way to show the results. Can you verify my findings with a IE-browser? BTW I don't see any BrowserLab non-IE problems with that https+ url: http://i.imgur.com/fOeqZ.png

Post by yalogin » Thu, Sep 15, 2011, 11:46 PM UTC

prostoalex wrote: post #9

Wait, so it's not an OpenSocial container?

Post by abraham » Fri, Sep 16, 2011, 3:16 AM UTC

thristian wrote: post #24

That's odd. I notice the "People" API has a field for "middle name", but I can't find such a field on my G+ profile page.

Post by AndrewDucker » Fri, Sep 16, 2011, 9:22 AM UTC

robtoo wrote: post #7

zdw wrote: post #3

I will give a HUGE HUG to the first person to let me pull RSS feeds or a Twitter stream into G+. (and I give great hugs)

I can actually see a good argument for the API remaining read-only so that Google+ emphasises original content and doesn't just end up as a ghost-town full of content syndicated in from elsewhere and sending people off to another site to join in the real conversation.