Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can actually see a good argument for the API remaining read-only so that Google+ emphasises original content and doesn't just end up as a ghost-town full of content syndicated in from elsewhere and sending people off to another site to join in the real conversation.
Yeah good point. Surely this will be unavoidable for Google - they'll need to open up write access for third party apps, and they'll be wanting those for sure.
Google+ Platform
11–20 of 30 posts
Re: Google+ Platform
#12I was wondering when an official public API would be ready. It should be interesting to see what people come up with.
Re: Google+ Platform
#13Re: Google+ Platform
#14Re: Google+ Platform
#15Check the BrowserLab results: http://i.imgur.com/S6dQP.png
I would say that there are two options:
* They don't test their site in IE9 (nor 8/7/6) or they don't know/care.
* They are actively doing this..
And I cannot believe the first..
Re: Google+ Platform
#16Has anyone gotten the people demo to work? I can't seem to get by own data, even after switching to private access. I get a 403 on everything.
Re: Google+ Platform
#17Has anyone gotten the people demo to work? I can't seem to get by own data, even after switching to private access. I get a 403 on everything.
Re: Google+ Platform
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah good point. Surely this will be unavoidable for Google - they'll need to open up write access for third party apps, and they'll be wanting those for sure.
It'd be fine by me if Google didn't open up API write access, or if they did such messages were banished to another tab, like the Games section.
Re: Google+ Platform
#19Has anyone gotten the people demo to work? I can't seem to get by own data, even after switching to private access. I get a 403 on everything.
Re: Google+ Platform
#20I will give a HUGE HUG to the first person to let me pull RSS feeds or a Twitter stream into G+. (and I give great hugs)