Live data from Hacker News

Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals

crypto.com

61–70 of 321 posts

Re: Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals

#61
post #18

This is why CRO requires 24 hours whitelist before you can transact withdrawals...

Understandable yet totally absurd. Can you imagine if your bank had the same requirement?

They certainly have similar requirements. ACH transfers take days, wire transfers require you to jump through verification hoops, ATMs have low daily limits.

Re: Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals

#62
post #12

> 2FA tokens for all users worldwide were subsequently revoked to ensure the new infrastructure was in effect. We have mandatory 2FA policies on both the frontend and backend to protect users during this revocation phase, as outflows such as withdrawals have a requirement to setup and use 2FA in order to withdraw. How is this supposed to work? They revoked all of their 2FA for all accounts? Doesn't this just open the…

I'm wondering if it's a badly-worded way of saying "anyone in the system gets kicked out and has to re-2FA". If they literally removed 2FA from everyone, that's insane.

[deleted]

Re: Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals

#64
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's funny how many comments are about Matt Damon. That must be a pretty sticky ad campaign. It's also bizarre that I never heard of them before this marketing blitz although they seemingly have enough cash to hire Matt Damon and buy naming rights to an NFL stadium. I guess all their budget went to marketing instead of hardening their platform.

The ad campaign is notable because, much like most Perfume ads, it's downright bizarre. The ad sells a concept extremely well and then makes the leap of a lifetime for the subject that is a crazy let down. Edit: the funny thing for me is that if the ad ended with the SpaceX (or Boeing, or Northrop, or USAF) logo and gave the SpaceX employment site at the end, I'm sure it would be seen as one of the best ads of the la…

To be fair, a more honest ad wouldn't be as compelling: "Exchange your real money for online scrip because reasons!"

Re: Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals

#65

how do you think it was done. said 2fa was bypassed for some accounts. maybe some sort of client side exploit.

Seems really unlikely, but maybe someone guessed or discovered the keys? Would likely only happen if Crypto.com somehow was generating them insecurely or if someone had inside access to their systems or something. Maybe a leak? Since it is across multiple currencies, I think it is unlikely it has to do with generation. Maybe could still be a leak or something.

If they had access to the private keys they wouldn't have to go through the crypto.com platform at all.

They'd just pop it in any wallet and sign withdrawal transactions.

There's no 2FA or whitelisted withdrawal addresses (for most tokens) or emails on-chain.

Re: Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals

#66
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm wondering if it's a badly-worded way of saying "anyone in the system gets kicked out and has to re-2FA". If they literally removed 2FA from everyone, that's insane.

yes, they literally logged everyone out, removed 2FA, and on the new login, users had to re-add 2FA

Wouldn't this also allow an attacker to add his own 2FA?

Re: Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals

#68
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> For context, this is the startup that has been using Matt Damon as it’s face. They're also notable lately for getting the naming rights to the (former) Staples Center. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto.com_Arena

I wouldn't call it a startup, it paid 700mil$ to rename an arena!

Venture capital used to be about placing small, diverse bets on a lot promising startups - everybody in the process was trying to make the world a better place

Since about 2018, VC game changed - now it's about brazenly placing massive bets on a small set of startups of increasingly questionable utility, using the funds and clout to ram their way through into monopoly positions. Not a speck of morality involved anymore - and nobody is even trying to pretend otherwise

Public image hasn't yet caught up with this reality

Re: Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals

#69
post #12

> 2FA tokens for all users worldwide were subsequently revoked to ensure the new infrastructure was in effect. We have mandatory 2FA policies on both the frontend and backend to protect users during this revocation phase, as outflows such as withdrawals have a requirement to setup and use 2FA in order to withdraw. How is this supposed to work? They revoked all of their 2FA for all accounts? Doesn't this just open the…

Time to play the classic crypto exchange game: hack or exit scam? Disabling 2FA in this scenario is dumb enough to raise the question of malfeasance of the part of this theft.

Somehow I doubt a fraudulent company on the verge of an exit scam would spend $700 million to rename an arena right before pulling the plug. Incompetent? Probably. Fraudulent? Unlikely.

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2021-11-16/crypto-sta...

Re: Crypto.com accounts had unauthorized withdrawals

#70
post #28

Thank goodness it's decentralized and there are no single points of failure.

I'm guessing this is sarcasm? crypto.com is very very far from a single point of failure.

They might be alluding to the removal of centralized authorities that would have otherwise been able to get that money back.
Post reply on HN