Your custom domain. Unlimited amount of users. No storage limit, but attachments stored only for 1 month. Option for saving attachments before deleting. Some safe ads in web client.
Would you register?
1–10 of 46 posts
Your custom domain. Unlimited amount of users. No storage limit, but attachments stored only for 1 month. Option for saving attachments before deleting. Some safe ads in web client.
Would you register?
with a storage limit the worst that can happen is that mails get rejected, but the senders do get notified. and, if set up well, forwarding should work even if the storage is full, so even rejections would not happen.
with a time limit i am relying on the forwarding always working, and, in case of failure i'd be loosing mail possibly without noticing. because it's attachments from old mail that i am not looking at now that would get deleted. that's not something i'd want to ever happen.
free or not, i'd rather have a storage limit but no time limit. either way i'd have to forward all emails to my local machine, so the storage won't do me much good other than as a temporary buffer. with a storage limit the worst that can happen is that mails get rejected, but the senders do get notified. and, if set up well, forwarding should work even if the storage is full, so even rejections would not happen. with…
Is it okay for you?
put the question into the title and start with "ask HN:". otherwise this post will be ignored. i almost flagged it as bogus.
free or not, i'd rather have a storage limit but no time limit. either way i'd have to forward all emails to my local machine, so the storage won't do me much good other than as a temporary buffer. with a storage limit the worst that can happen is that mails get rejected, but the senders do get notified. and, if set up well, forwarding should work even if the storage is full, so even rejections would not happen. with…
Old emails will be saved. But without attachments. Is it okay for you?
the only time it is ok is when it is backups that are superseded by new backups, or a trash storage where i put things manually, and even there i prefer to empty the trash manually too.
but this is just how i am used to working. i realize that i accept messages in irc disappearing if i don't log them too (but then i set up logs for quite a number of channels that matter to me), and i could accept this service for certain use cases like for mailing lists which are usually archived elsewhere anyways.
but i could not use it for emails from family, friends or customers who might send me things that i want to keep.
furthermore, if you consider encrypted email you can't even tell what is an attachment and what is the body. removing the attachment would also affect unencrypted, but signed emails.
free or not, i'd rather have a storage limit but no time limit. either way i'd have to forward all emails to my local machine, so the storage won't do me much good other than as a temporary buffer. with a storage limit the worst that can happen is that mails get rejected, but the senders do get notified. and, if set up well, forwarding should work even if the storage is full, so even rejections would not happen. with…
Old emails will be saved. But without attachments. Is it okay for you?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Old emails will be saved. But without attachments. Is it okay for you?
No, a lot of times, the attachment is more important than the text of the e-mail.