Live data from Hacker News

37signals.com - Evolution of a homepage

37signals.com

11–20 of 24 posts

Re: 37signals.com - Evolution of a homepage

#11
There's a good mix of iterative changes and structural changes. I think the structural ones (that don't deal with aesthetics) are the most interesting.

One trick I like to do is stand a few feet back from the monitor/LCD, and try to, in 3-5 seconds, figure out what I'm looking at. I think its a good trick because you'll realize where your eyes go to first (smaller text/details usually gets blurry), and the time interval will tell you what you're communicating clearly.

When you compare the first version in the video with the last using this trick, there's a huge difference.

The 2009 version has an overwhelming amount of detail, with an ambiguous "Change your Business"/"Change the way you work" title. A lot of information is crammed in the first frame (company history, latest news, etc). The 2011 version is remarkably clearer: The two large texts explain the product offerings and that they are kind of a big deal (social proof) - both keys to selling. The rest of the information is prioritized descendingly. "Style" (what people most typical mean when they say design) has been minimized.

Another company's website that is great with this (standing back/first thing that pops in your head) is, suprise, surpise... apple.com

Re: 37signals.com - Evolution of a homepage

#12
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I noticed "Drop a bomb" too and thought wow...what a terrible idea. First and foremost because their competitors can obviously avail themselves of the same tools.

That was just for internal fun. I didn't know it would ever make it outside our walls ;)

Figured it had to be something like that if every checked out version was being displayed, and it was on the screen for such a short amount of time.

Re: 37signals.com - Evolution of a homepage

#14

I loved the little war over whether to use 'us' or 'it' (0:52-0:55) in the phrase: Millions of people depend on our software. Entrepreneurs, small businesses and teams inside big organisations rely on it/us daily.

There were dozens of subtle variations on this statement that were never committed. I hope to find some time to do a detailed post on that sometime.

Re: 37signals.com - Evolution of a homepage

#19

I loved the little war over whether to use 'us' or 'it' (0:52-0:55) in the phrase: Millions of people depend on our software. Entrepreneurs, small businesses and teams inside big organisations rely on it/us daily.

There were dozens of subtle variations on this statement that were never committed. I hope to find some time to do a detailed post on that sometime.

I'd love to see a post on the branding lessons learned through variations in copy. What phrases worked and what ones sucked. The biggest branding mishap I see on a regular basis is a company that doesn't know how to talk to its audience.

Re: 37signals.com - Evolution of a homepage

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not much overall change? Midway through the movie the complete design for the entire thing changes from a colourful, pastel shaded page to black/white with large fonts and a focus on copy. That's a pretty huge change and definitely not inspired by marginal A/B tests. They just changed their minds, tried something different, and stuck with it.

Well overall they changed it once. I know a lot of websites that have made huge changes several times. I expected more from the video. There were no evolution. Just little image/text/size-changes. And then they changed it completely, and did the same as before.

I was expecting more, but instead like the minor evolution. You can see the text be tweaked bit by bit. Font, sizing, arrangement within sections, word replacements, etc.

Think it speaks to continually tweaking your site bit by bit. Don't need to completely redo it or do massive revamps.

Post reply on HN