Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is it that whenever intrinsic, usual operations of capitalism are described (which happen 99% of the time) such as… 1) whenever VCs invest in shares of a project 2) they tend to subsidize money-losing unit economics to “reduce friction” resulting in attempts to lock-in people and monetize their attention later 3) when the VCs later dump it on the public, the company has to now answer to wall street shareholders a…
I don't see how cryptocurrency solves any of the problems. Items 1-4 would still exist. The only difference is that the corporations would be funded with ETH/BTC/DOGE/whatever rather than US Dollars.
To use a real world example: DisneyWorld is a city owned by a corporation, instead of democratically run. Because the people who own DisneyWorld shares (shareholder class) aren’t the visitors — the visitors buy DisneyDollars. They are the consumer class.
And there is also the working class (people who work in DisneyWorld) and their employers (small capitalists) who run a business inside DisneyWorld and pay rent.
Disneyworld and other cities could have its own smart economy with DisneyDollars and never have to raise money from speculators. Think of DisneyDollars as utility tokens and shares as security tokens for speculators.
Here is how it works in detail: https://intercoin.org/communities.pdf