Aside from the obvious, can someone at least tell me how these claims are rationalized because they make no sense:
1) If the hackers copied and deleted the private keys from his computer
2) Why does Bitcoin SV need to be modified in order for the funds to be accessed
Do people on HN even know why those statements are not reconcilable? Does TheRegister, does the judge? I don't care what Craig Wright knows or thinks, he is a troll regardless, but I'm not even sure if his incoherent claims are something slightly more coherent that everyone else messed up.
Wait, is he saying that because he doesn't have the private keys, he wants the whole Bitcoin SV network modified to give him access to funds in a specific address? lol. okay.
I feel like he could just rent some hashpower to force a confidence breaking change on the network but I guess he wants court approval.