Live data from Hacker News

Wine 7.0

winehq.org

41–50 of 153 posts

Re: Wine 7.0

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the worst would be .doc extensions instead of .docx Other than that, give me WP5.1 baby

IMO, .doc might be the second worst format ever invented (second to PDF). It is a proprietary, binary only format for storing text documents. Who thought that was a good idea?

I cant judge .doc on its technical merits, but its closed nature is really something.

Rumor is that, in the end, even MS didn’t understand the format?

Re: Wine 7.0

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IMO, .doc might be the second worst format ever invented (second to PDF). It is a proprietary, binary only format for storing text documents. Who thought that was a good idea?

It's an artifact of a time when RAM was extremely expensive and CPUs were slow. Dumping the in-memory binary representation to a disk was apparently the logical choice at the time.

Quick and easy for the devs too I bet.

Re: Wine 7.0

#43
post #37
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting. My main use case for using Word would be for my CV. Since I don't want it to render a single bit different than on a recruiting manager's screen. Unfortunately PDF still seems to be a bit of a disadvantage in some cases.

I have never heard anyone have problems with a PDF CV. If that's a disqualification reason... I don't know. This is speaking of IT of course; if you are talking to a small business doing woodworking or whatever, all bets are off on what tech they can and cannot handle. I'd still bet on PDF more than doc(x), though, since maybe they don't have an expensive Word license but PDF should render in browsers.

It is actually not for employment, but as I work as consultant / contractor I have these agencies between me and possible customers. They enjoy to edit out any contact information from CVs to act as middlemen. It sucks but does not reflect on the actual assignment in the end.

Re: Wine 7.0

#44
post #3

I recently used Wine to run Office 97 on Debian, just for old time's sake. I ended up liking it so much that I now use it for my word processing and spreadsheet tasks. This classic version is feature complete to me. Wine ensures it lives on, long past its support date and on an alien operating system. And clippit says hello! Screenshot for the curious: https://imgur.com/a/GmVUAfC It shows Word 97 on Linux editing a l…

I thought its name was clippy?

Re: Wine 7.0

#45
post #37
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Interesting. My main use case for using Word would be for my CV. Since I don't want it to render a single bit different than on a recruiting manager's screen. Unfortunately PDF still seems to be a bit of a disadvantage in some cases.

I have never heard anyone have problems with a PDF CV. If that's a disqualification reason... I don't know. This is speaking of IT of course; if you are talking to a small business doing woodworking or whatever, all bets are off on what tech they can and cannot handle. I'd still bet on PDF more than doc(x), though, since maybe they don't have an expensive Word license but PDF should render in browsers.

There are still corners of the world where docx is the One True Format, and PDFs make you seem like the weirdo. I can easily imagine it being too different/difficult and a candidate being rejected from the enormous pile for that. The Internet has made it far more common to get outsized responses; eg 800 applicants for 3 positions, with no easy way to sort through them all.

Re: Wine 7.0

#47
post #3

I recently used Wine to run Office 97 on Debian, just for old time's sake. I ended up liking it so much that I now use it for my word processing and spreadsheet tasks. This classic version is feature complete to me. Wine ensures it lives on, long past its support date and on an alien operating system. And clippit says hello! Screenshot for the curious: https://imgur.com/a/GmVUAfC It shows Word 97 on Linux editing a l…

My IT department still uses a home-grown work ticketing system built in Access 97. The leadership in the department built it custom to their wants in the 90s and, just like you, it's feature-complete-ish. Pain in the butt for newer employees like me.

Please don't tell them that it works in Wine. It needs to die.

Re: Wine 7.0

#48
post #3

I recently used Wine to run Office 97 on Debian, just for old time's sake. I ended up liking it so much that I now use it for my word processing and spreadsheet tasks. This classic version is feature complete to me. Wine ensures it lives on, long past its support date and on an alien operating system. And clippit says hello! Screenshot for the curious: https://imgur.com/a/GmVUAfC It shows Word 97 on Linux editing a l…

I thought its name was clippy?

Not officially, but "Clippy" is way more common https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_Assistant

Re: Wine 7.0

#49
post #3

I recently used Wine to run Office 97 on Debian, just for old time's sake. I ended up liking it so much that I now use it for my word processing and spreadsheet tasks. This classic version is feature complete to me. Wine ensures it lives on, long past its support date and on an alien operating system. And clippit says hello! Screenshot for the curious: https://imgur.com/a/GmVUAfC It shows Word 97 on Linux editing a l…

I thought its name was clippy?

His public persona, yes. We're close enough that I'm permitted to use his real name.

Re: Wine 7.0

#50

> Once the remaining modules are converted to PE, this will make it possible to run 32-bit applications without installing 32-bit Unix libraries. That sounds really amazing, I can't wait. That will really simplify using 32bit windows programs on a 64 bit OS.

Crossover has had this feature for awhile[0] 0: https://www.codeweavers.com/blog/jwhite/2019/12/10/celebrati...

It is nice to see the changes being moved to the open source version, I appreciate the fact that they do let non-paying users use those features.
Post reply on HN