Record cases across the planet regardless of vaccination rates...how much longer until official sources are willing to acknowledge that these vaccines are not nearly as effective as claimed? How long before official sources acknowledge that breakthrough cases are probably drastically underreported? I can't be the only one surrounded by fully vaccinated individuals testing positive. Its happening far too often for me…
Then you have not been reading a single thing coming from the official sources because nobody has stated that vaccines do much against mild disease in Omicron, but they do prevent the hospital system from being saturated with cases and drastically reduce death rates. If at this point you're not aware of this, which has been repeated over and over again in media, you should reconsider your sources of information.
> While so-called “breakthrough infections” among this group do happen, they remain the exception: In fact, recent data indicates there is only 1 confirmed positive case per 5,000 fully vaccinated Americans per week.
The startup I work for must be incredibly unlucky given that 7+/14 vaccinated employees have recently tested positive if the odds really are 1 in 5000. I'm sure my anecdote is not unique.
The vaccines were billed as the way out of this pandemic from day one. It was assumed that they were "safe and effective" [against infection and spread] long before there was ample time to gather data, especially given the difficulty of collecting data on breakthrough cases when people have no incentive to report them, and most probably did not even presume that they were sick with covid if they experienced mild symptoms post vaccination, given that the messaging around the vaccines would have biased people to believe that they had come down with some infection other than covid.
The same way that people, and doctors, have been biased against reporting side effects. Yeah, sure, its just anecdote, except there's a hell of a lot of anecdote going around and those crazy conspiracy theorists have already been quietly proven right about vaccines interfering with womens' monthly cycles, among other suspicions.
It is incredibly difficult to properly evaluate vaccines when your test subjects and their doctors have been indoctrinated by strong messaging regarding the test's presumed safety. I'm not suggesting that it was entirely intentional (though partly on behalf of pharma) but at this point all of the official data is suspect due to an emergent faith-like bias.
That's not even getting into the ridiculousness of trusting clinical data from pfizer, moderna et al for the initial data which lead to rushed vaccine approval. This has been a political game from the start.