Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I bought and tested the filtration of every mask on Amazon

armbrustusa.com

241–250 of 250 posts

Re: Show HN: I bought and tested the filtration of every mask on Amazon

#241

I've spent about 1,000 hours on this with my team using a very expensive (~$250k) lab and I'd love for this to be a great resource for people when choosing a mask. The heavy lift we are doing here is around our particulate filtration efficiency test in which we do either the NIOSH N95 NaCL (0.3 micron) test or the ASTM 0.1 micron latex particle test. I'd love HN feedback on how we improve the interface and make this…

I’m not seeing AirPop masks on this list, see https://www.airpophealth.com/us/home

Re: Show HN: I bought and tested the filtration of every mask on Amazon

#242

I've spent about 1,000 hours on this with my team using a very expensive (~$250k) lab and I'd love for this to be a great resource for people when choosing a mask. The heavy lift we are doing here is around our particulate filtration efficiency test in which we do either the NIOSH N95 NaCL (0.3 micron) test or the ASTM 0.1 micron latex particle test. I'd love HN feedback on how we improve the interface and make this…

I’m also not seeing U.S. Mask on that list. The thing I like about their KN95 style mask is that each one is individually packaged, unlike almost all the other masks I’ve seen.

Re: Show HN: I bought and tested the filtration of every mask on Amazon

#243

I've spent about 1,000 hours on this with my team using a very expensive (~$250k) lab and I'd love for this to be a great resource for people when choosing a mask. The heavy lift we are doing here is around our particulate filtration efficiency test in which we do either the NIOSH N95 NaCL (0.3 micron) test or the ASTM 0.1 micron latex particle test. I'd love HN feedback on how we improve the interface and make this…

Your filtration test appears to be only testing the mask fabric, but not the fit. I see a number of surgical masks over 95%. I don't think that would be possible in practice, because of leaks at the sides and top. I'd expect more like 50%. But, you don't appear to have the equipment to do a fit test. Refer to the 3M video on how to fit test an N95. I realize that N95 and surgical masks have different standards, but y…

yes i could make a mask out of plastic film and it would have 100% efficiency

Re: Show HN: I bought and tested the filtration of every mask on Amazon

#244

I've spent about 1,000 hours on this with my team using a very expensive (~$250k) lab and I'd love for this to be a great resource for people when choosing a mask. The heavy lift we are doing here is around our particulate filtration efficiency test in which we do either the NIOSH N95 NaCL (0.3 micron) test or the ASTM 0.1 micron latex particle test. I'd love HN feedback on how we improve the interface and make this…

The viewer should be able to select only those masks that pass. They should also be able to select a maximum breathability score. They should also be able to select minimum PFE rating.

Re: Show HN: I bought and tested the filtration of every mask on Amazon

#245

Full disclosure: I intentionally keep the metal stripe unbent to create two air gaps to both sides of my nose for more comfortable breathing. Cheers!

If you are wearing glasses that will fog them up real quick. There are even 3d-printed clips to make them even more tight.

Re: Show HN: I bought and tested the filtration of every mask on Amazon

#246

I've spent about 1,000 hours on this with my team using a very expensive (~$250k) lab and I'd love for this to be a great resource for people when choosing a mask. The heavy lift we are doing here is around our particulate filtration efficiency test in which we do either the NIOSH N95 NaCL (0.3 micron) test or the ASTM 0.1 micron latex particle test. I'd love HN feedback on how we improve the interface and make this…

Is this a mask testing company or a mask selling company?

How could I possibly trust one company to do both?

Re: Show HN: I bought and tested the filtration of every mask on Amazon

#247

I've spent about 1,000 hours on this with my team using a very expensive (~$250k) lab and I'd love for this to be a great resource for people when choosing a mask. The heavy lift we are doing here is around our particulate filtration efficiency test in which we do either the NIOSH N95 NaCL (0.3 micron) test or the ASTM 0.1 micron latex particle test. I'd love HN feedback on how we improve the interface and make this…

Um, Your site appears to be completely broken - once I scroll down once scrolling (up or down) no longer works at all.

Re: Show HN: I bought and tested the filtration of every mask on Amazon

#248
They did not test every one as they missed what I got last week:

GVS N31000 Segre Folded N99

So far they are great. Snug fit but not horribly uncomfortable like some N95s I have worn. They also have a plastic do-dad that so far has kept the straps from breaking off (all so common to N95s). Short use period of a few days but no issue with the metal nose piece either.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08PH37ZLK?psc=1&ref=ppx_yo2_dt_b_...

Re: Show HN: I bought and tested the filtration of every mask on Amazon

#249
post #33

I'm not seeing anything but a list of mask names with no other information. Has the site fallen over? (Chrome 96 on MacOS 11.6)

It wasn't optimized for mobile but is now... please LMK what you think!

Not mobile — Chrome 97 on MacOS.

Re: Show HN: I bought and tested the filtration of every mask on Amazon

#250
post #236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks for the response. I understand your reasoning for failing the KN95s, but then what about the Lutema mask, which uses a proprietary standard? Lutema includes some lab test documents [0] but I can't find any technical information about what results exactly is required to qualify as an "M series" mask. They mostly seem to compare with with KN95 masks, but without really saying what makes them different [1] (note…

The Lutema does not claim to have an internationally recognized standard, which is why it "passes" because there is no way to fail it. The pass/fail column can be considered more of a "is this manufacturer lying?" field. Perhaps it needs another value if it doesn't claim any standards.

No way to fail it but you also can't pass a non-existent test. N/A for cases like this would be more accurate.
Post reply on HN