I'm surprised that there's not a single comment here about 802.11ay which is also 60GHz. Each channel on that standard can do something like 40Gbps, which is nuts. From Wikipedia[0]: > The link-rate per stream is 44 Gbit/s, with four streams this goes up to 176 Gbit/s. Yes, it can't penetrate walls, but is huge for point to point communication. Think VR headset bandwidth, file transfers between devices, wireless back…
> You can "sense" with a lot more resolution if you use a camera and light bulb. (Visible) Light has a frequency of around 400-790 THz, which explains why it has a inherently better resolution.
The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
51–60 of 235 posts
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
+1 As many APs today are already cloud dependent I can totally see where all the sensed data will be stored and out of the owners control.
How would this be useful? Collecting the average distance away from an access point someone uses their phone or whatever?
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#53Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#54Is it just me, or does this seems like a really, really bad idea? The privacy implications here seem… disturbing.
Technology can't be stopped by individual engineers refusing to invent it, it can only be stopped by everyone agreeing on the ways it shouldn't be used. So it was for arson (fire), homicide (every weapon since the rock), and obscene material (all communications technology), and so must it be for privacy and the various techniques of monitoring us.
It may also increase market demand for light-based wireless networking (Li-Fi) which has the advantage of being stopped by existing walls.
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#55Is it just me, or does this seems like a really, really bad idea? The privacy implications here seem… disturbing.
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#56I want my Wi-Fi to deliver me fast internet access, not track my position. Have a feeling this will be used for il-intent and monetized by future routers
But tracking your position allows it to give you fast internet access.
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#57I'm surprised that there's not a single comment here about 802.11ay which is also 60GHz. Each channel on that standard can do something like 40Gbps, which is nuts. From Wikipedia[0]: > The link-rate per stream is 44 Gbit/s, with four streams this goes up to 176 Gbit/s. Yes, it can't penetrate walls, but is huge for point to point communication. Think VR headset bandwidth, file transfers between devices, wireless back…
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#58Is it just me, or does this seems like a really, really bad idea? The privacy implications here seem… disturbing.
I think future home privacy will go beyond blinds. We will be lining the walls in RF blocking sheets.
QuietRock 530RF drywall will block sound and RF, https://www.buildsite.com/pdf/pabcogypsum/QuietRock-530-Inst...
Re: The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
+1 As many APs today are already cloud dependent I can totally see where all the sensed data will be stored and out of the owners control.
How would this be useful? Collecting the average distance away from an access point someone uses their phone or whatever?
“Your honor, wifi data clearly shows the defendant was…”