[But a leading scientist told Sir Jeremy that “further debate would do unnecessary harm to science in general and science in China in particular”. Dr Collins, the former director of the US National Institutes of Health, warned it could damage “international harmony”.] The entire foundation of science is based upon empirical observation and asking hypothetical questions. It is discouraging that scientists can make sta…
True, but it’s possible to ask questions that sway public opinion. Look at all the “studies” tobacco companies paid for. Or the racist scientific theories that attempted to justify slavery.
If you’re asking questions about a lab leak out of genuine scientific interest, that’s perfectly legitimate.
But if you’re asking out of a desire to win political points, stir up tensions, etc., that’s destructive.
There are plenty of actors on both sides, using the same tool of scientific inquiry for good and for ill.