You might be asking, why a pig? I don't know, but forever ago I wrote software for a cardiovascular imaging lab and pigs were their primary test subjects. I was like, "why pigs?" and the PI was like, "Imaging-wise, pig hearts aren't too different from humans. Plus, we can give them a heart attack in the scanner and not go to jail. Some labs use dogs. I just can't do that."
U.S. surgeons transplant pig heart into human patient
71–80 of 731 posts
Re: U.S. surgeons transplant pig heart into human patient
#72Re: U.S. surgeons transplant pig heart into human patient
#73You might be asking, why a pig? I don't know, but forever ago I wrote software for a cardiovascular imaging lab and pigs were their primary test subjects. I was like, "why pigs?" and the PI was like, "Imaging-wise, pig hearts aren't too different from humans. Plus, we can give them a heart attack in the scanner and not go to jail. Some labs use dogs. I just can't do that."
I heard they are humanized 'pigs'. Ie. engineered so their organs don't trigger our immune system. Not sure how true is this, or it is just a myth.
Re: U.S. surgeons transplant pig heart into human patient
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
They’re not making the pig more human, they’re removing the markers of ‘foreign’ that would make it an immune target. So it’s a nice vanilla organ that minimally attracts the attention of the immune system.
On the other hand (and I am being flippant... Slightly) how do you know that removing this one gene doesn't unlock consciousness?
Re: U.S. surgeons transplant pig heart into human patient
#75When I was a teenager there was a novel adapted for TV by the BBC called “Pig Heart Boy”. It explored the emotional impact of this type of procedure on a teenager and the response from the public, both good and bad. I don’t remember much about it but it looks like it won a BAFTA. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_Heart_Boy
Re: U.S. surgeons transplant pig heart into human patient
#76You might be asking, why a pig? I don't know, but forever ago I wrote software for a cardiovascular imaging lab and pigs were their primary test subjects. I was like, "why pigs?" and the PI was like, "Imaging-wise, pig hearts aren't too different from humans. Plus, we can give them a heart attack in the scanner and not go to jail. Some labs use dogs. I just can't do that."
I heard they are humanized 'pigs'. Ie. engineered so their organs don't trigger our immune system. Not sure how true is this, or it is just a myth.
Re: U.S. surgeons transplant pig heart into human patient
#77I wonder why an artificial heart wasn't an option here.
Other places that are reporting on him say "He was deemed ineligible for an artificial heart pump due to uncontrollable arrhythmia."
Re: U.S. surgeons transplant pig heart into human patient
#78The pig life expectancy is about 12-18 years. Does it mean that the heart will work about so long?
Re: U.S. surgeons transplant pig heart into human patient
#79The pig life expectancy is about 12-18 years. Does it mean that the heart will work about so long?
Re: U.S. surgeons transplant pig heart into human patient
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
They’re not making the pig more human, they’re removing the markers of ‘foreign’ that would make it an immune target. So it’s a nice vanilla organ that minimally attracts the attention of the immune system.
On the other hand (and I am being flippant... Slightly) how do you know that removing this one gene doesn't unlock consciousness?
The words you're looking for are sentience or even sapience.