Adversarial Wordle
qntm.org
Adversarial Wordle
1–10 of 72 posts
Re: Adversarial Wordle
#2"Full writeup coming another time but mainly it doesn't pick any single word, it maintains a list of possibilities and reduces the list as little as possible with each guess."
Re: Adversarial Wordle
#3For anyone else wondering what makes this adversarial, here's a tweet explanation from the author: https://twitter.com/qntm/status/1479989124908007426 "Full writeup coming another time but mainly it doesn't pick any single word, it maintains a list of possibilities and reduces the list as little as possible with each guess."
Re: Adversarial Wordle
#4Re: Adversarial Wordle
#5Then I learnt that the inventor of Wordle is named Josh Wardle, which could be a portmanteau of war and wordle.
Re: Adversarial Wordle
#6Winner, winner, chicken dinner.
Re: Adversarial Wordle
#7I’ve taken six guesses four times and eight twice. It’s so very tempting to solve it, finding the quickest path, or at least a local maximum if brute-forcing the entire thing turns out to be too computationally prohibitive.
Re: Adversarial Wordle
#8 S T E R N (0 green, 0 yellow)
P L A I D (0 green, 0 yellow)
M U C K Y (1 green, 0 yellow)
G O R G E (1 green, 0 yellow)
W O O F Y (3 green, 0 yellow)
B O O Z Y (4 green, 0 yellow)
B O O B Y (5 green, 0 yellow)
You guessed successfully in 7 guesses!
S T E R N (0 green, 0 yellow)
P L A I D (0 green, 0 yellow)
B O U G H (2 green, 0 yellow)
W O O Z Y (3 green, 0 yellow)
B O O K Y (4 green, 0 yellow)
B O O B Y (5 green, 0 yellow)
You guessed successfully in 6 guesses!Re: Adversarial Wordle
#9I’ve taken six guesses four times and eight twice. It’s so very tempting to solve it, finding the quickest path, or at least a local maximum if brute-forcing the entire thing turns out to be too computationally prohibitive.
it would be fun to see if you can pick a word and then force that to be the green word by your guesses
Re: Adversarial Wordle
#10Somehow, I always get a large tropical seabird... S T E R N (0 green, 0 yellow) P L A I D (0 green, 0 yellow) M U C K Y (1 green, 0 yellow) G O R G E (1 green, 0 yellow) W O O F Y (3 green, 0 yellow) B O O Z Y (4 green, 0 yellow) B O O B Y (5 green, 0 yellow) You guessed successfully in 7 guesses! S T E R N (0 green, 0 yellow) P L A I D (0 green, 0 yellow) B O U G H (2 green, 0 yellow) W O O Z Y (3 green, 0 yellow) B…
T R I A D (0 green, 0 yellow)
H O N E S (0 green, 0 yellow)
C L U M P (0 green, 2 yellow)
B U L K Y (3 green, 0 yellow)
F U L L Y (4 green, 0 yellow)
G U L L Y (5 green, 0 yellow)
Looking at the similarities, I'm wondering if the adversarial nature will generally lead to higher-than-naively-expected frequencies of:Words with 'y', as people will tend to 'eliminate' the common vowels early, leaving 'y' as a 'substitute vowel' to fill in.
Words with repeated and doubled letters, as a round progresses and the pool ov available letters shrinks.
I wonder what other patterns might emerge from the ruleset?