The picture is a visualisation, but does the telescope have a camera pointing at itself?
James Webb is fully deployed
11–20 of 522 posts
Re: James Webb is fully deployed
#12Great news! I’m happy about this. Just curious - had this mission critically fail, how likely would we be to simply try again? Who needs to approve the cost for that? Would it be politically important to succeed currently?
Re: James Webb is fully deployed
#13I wonder when it can start observing.
Re: James Webb is fully deployed
#14I wonder when it can start observing.
Re: James Webb is fully deployed
#15For those not up on the project, what are some of the earliest novel types of information we expect to receive from it?
Re: James Webb is fully deployed
#16For those not up on the project, what are some of the earliest novel types of information we expect to receive from it?
https://jwst.nasa.gov/content/science/origins.html
Note that the next 5 months or so will consist of mirror cooling and calibration, so nothing until summer.
Re: James Webb is fully deployed
#17For those not up on the project, what are some of the earliest novel types of information we expect to receive from it?
- very early galaxies (so far that they are redshifted to far IR). Hence the “looking into the start of the Universe” talk). We know they are there, and that they are unusual and super-interesting, but just can’t see them.
I think this is high on the agenda so I’m guessing some PR shots of ancient galaxies are due.
- cold objects nearby; brown dwarves, rogue planets etc. Maybe planets around nearby stars.
- I haven’t seen this discussed, but maybe: Kuiper Belt objects, maybe looking for Planet X etc.
Re: James Webb is fully deployed
#18For those not up on the project, what are some of the earliest novel types of information we expect to receive from it?
Re: James Webb is fully deployed
#19For those not up on the project, what are some of the earliest novel types of information we expect to receive from it?
Huge. This is the first large telescope observing in far infrared. Some things: - very early galaxies (so far that they are redshifted to far IR). Hence the “looking into the start of the Universe” talk). We know they are there, and that they are unusual and super-interesting, but just can’t see them. I think this is high on the agenda so I’m guessing some PR shots of ancient galaxies are due. - cold objects nearby;…
IIRC the telescope will be able to see "back" into 98% of the observable universe.