Live data from Hacker News

Omicron at 100% Prevalence, Colorado

covid19.colorado.gov

161–170 of 703 posts

Re: Omicron at 100% Prevalence, Colorado

#162
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But now we’ll be able to reach herd immunity. Very mild and highly transmissible. This is the best possible outcome.

I've been watching over both my parents the past week. Both Omicron cases. "Very mild" is... not accurate. It hasn't hospitalized them, but even without quarantining, they'd be incapable of living anything like a normal life. The common cold it most certainly IS NOT. (Both are double vaxxed and boosted, btw)

Was it worse than a flu for them, or roughly similar?

Re: Omicron at 100% Prevalence, Colorado

#163
post #125

Surely this is the end of the pandemic? With an estimated 300k+ cases per day here in the UK, that is 10 million this month on top of everyone who has already had it. It’s as though nobody is ready to acknowledge the elephant in the room that Covid is nearly finished. Or am I missing something?

Quoted post unavailable.

I’m no fan of Biden but let’s be clear that this transcends administrations. Trump put Fauci on TV every day, Trump granted billions to big pharma. Just like Biden takes the fall for dumb wars started by Bush and Obama, he’ll take the fall for Trumps dumb fight against COVID.

The problem is that we have institutions like the Fed and the CDC and WHO that have been proven completely incompetent when power is deferred to them. They panicked and now we pay the price.

Re: Omicron at 100% Prevalence, Colorado

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can also catch the cold over and over. 1 or 2 colds a year is pretty typical.

Covid has a death rate hundreds of times higher than a cold. Colds don't make healthy women in their twenties stay up all night coughing so hard their oxygen dips into the 80s. Colds don't cause lung, heart, and cognitive damage that is potentially cumulative. If covid brain fog compounds over time there will be some serious damn consequences.

The death rate isn't the same for your 1st case of covid and your nth case.

Re: Omicron at 100% Prevalence, Colorado

#165
The metrics presentation on the page are very misleading. The use of color is confusing (red generally means bad or getting worse, green means good or getting better). The up/down arrows are seemingly red or blue arbitrarily. Why are the four rows each colored differently? Just a bizarre UI.

If you have to present data to a user, please read a book by Edward Tufte first. His books will change your entire perspective, e.g.

https://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/books_vdqi

Re: Omicron at 100% Prevalence, Colorado

#166

Surely this is the end of the pandemic? With an estimated 300k+ cases per day here in the UK, that is 10 million this month on top of everyone who has already had it. It’s as though nobody is ready to acknowledge the elephant in the room that Covid is nearly finished. Or am I missing something?

You're missing the fact you can catch it over and over. My wife is currently battling Omicron after we both had covid at the start of last year. Fully vaccinated and boosted three weeks ago, caught it anyway. With an infected population this massive mutations happen fast enough to cause a new wave before the old one burns out.

I have omicron right now (4-5 months after 2nd jab, so pretty much no effect from that) and it's just like a common cold (certainly wouldn't call it "battling omicron"). I have zero problems with getting this each year.

Re: Omicron at 100% Prevalence, Colorado

#167

Can anyone point me to a reliable source that explains in layman's terms why one cancels out the other and it's not possible to have both (say) delta and omicron at once. Somewhat tongue in cheek, but since cancellation seems to be the case, could we not create a version that was 100x more transmissible than omicron but completely benign? Cane toads in Australia aside ;)

Just a no sources comment: you can get confection of the flu and covid or any variant with any other variant at the same time. It's just over time one variant out competes the others because it's more fit.

Dumb question that's been vaguely nagging at me: If a host can have both at the same time, in what sense are they competing? There are plenty of cells to infect in a particular host aren't there?

Re: Omicron at 100% Prevalence, Colorado

#168
The spread is so fast, all charts now look insane and would be terrifying if not for the mild symptoms.

I wonder if it is possible for a virus to wipe itself out by spreading so quickly that it ends up with very few left to infect, assuming it doesn't mutate enough in time.

Re: Omicron at 100% Prevalence, Colorado

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're missing the fact you can catch it over and over. My wife is currently battling Omicron after we both had covid at the start of last year. Fully vaccinated and boosted three weeks ago, caught it anyway. With an infected population this massive mutations happen fast enough to cause a new wave before the old one burns out.

Do we know if a previous omicron infection helps confer immunity to future omicron infections?

If past history is any indicator, then yes.

Re: Omicron at 100% Prevalence, Colorado

#170

omicron has solidly taken over Vancouver BC. Anecdotal evidence: in the past two years (except this past week) I have only known 1 person who got covid. In the past week I know over 20 people who have got covid. I sincerely hope that this is the beginning of the end of covid lockdowns. omicron is taking the world by storm and I wouldn't be surprised if the entire world gets it in the next few weeks.

+1, I work in a small, fully remote company, and up until the past 2 weeks, I know of only one colleague who had been infected. 5 people were out last week because of COVID. 5 people who live in different states.
Post reply on HN