Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines (2020)
blogs.bmj.com
Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines (2020)
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines (2020)
#22020. Ancient history.
Re: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines (2020)
#32020. Ancient history.
Yet still relevant and yet to be answered for: https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
Re: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines (2020)
#42020. Ancient history.
Yet still relevant and yet to be answered for: https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
It could be reasonable to automatically release the data the FDA gets upon FDA approval of a liability-shielded vaccine.
It's probably nothing, so why not release the data and put the conspiracy theories about data integrity to bed?
Re: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines (2020)
#5I'm 'surprised' drug makers are allowed to run their own trials, and, when they do, that people trust anything they say.
Re: Pfizer and Moderna’s “95% effective” vaccines (2020)
#6you don't seem to get it, especially after so much coverage of the topic, the initial immuno-design was for the original COVID-19 strain, as the virus mutates and new variants emerge the efficacy of the original vaccine decreases; you have two options: a) get more immune protection from additional doses or b) get a new vaccine that is specifically designed for the new variant. ultimately, new and more variants will become weaker, and COVID will approximate the flu. this will require annual shots.