A Visual Introduction to Chef
mynameiskate.com
A Visual Introduction to Chef
1–10 of 21 posts
Re: A Visual Introduction to Chef
#2Re: A Visual Introduction to Chef
#3Re: A Visual Introduction to Chef
#4What's the current sentiment on Chef vs. Puppet these days?
Re: A Visual Introduction to Chef
#5I would like to read this, but unfortunately there's a database involved in serving the pages. Remember, kids: text and images were served happily on the 'net long before MySQL existed.
Re: A Visual Introduction to Chef
#6What's the current sentiment on Chef vs. Puppet these days?
They're both straightjackets. Chef is easier to cut your way out of and then use as a normal jacket
As I've said in the past, the consensus is simply "use a CM system," especially if you have to maintain these machines for a while (or if you have 50+ machines to take care of.) It's much better than dealing with various shell scripts or whatever else.
Re: A Visual Introduction to Chef
#7What's the current sentiment on Chef vs. Puppet these days?
Puppet is the more mature technology of the two, but (so I'm told) there's an important limitation in that there is no way to automatically e.g. reload the web server if its config file changes. Both these systems have some issues with information flowing in only one direction.
Re: A Visual Introduction to Chef
#8What's the current sentiment on Chef vs. Puppet these days?
Re: A Visual Introduction to Chef
#9Re: A Visual Introduction to Chef
#10What's the current sentiment on Chef vs. Puppet these days?
Chef has invented a new object system and execution model within Ruby.
Neither's approach is particularly good in this respect, but the latter is less onerous.