Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Let's build an HN uBlacklist to improve our Google search results?

news.ycombinator.com

81–90 of 284 posts

Re: Ask HN: Let's build an HN uBlacklist to improve our Google search results?

#81
uBlock Origin supports blocking search results, so I don't require an additional browser extension. I maintain a blocklist for myself, targetting Google and DuckDuckGo [1]. Feel free to contribute more websites or use this list as a template for your own repository.

[1] https://github.com/darekkay/config-files/blob/master/adblock...

Re: Ask HN: Let's build an HN uBlacklist to improve our Google search results?

#82
post #55

>become worse lately thanks to all those StackOverflow and Github clones A google search showing some of these leech type sites: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22code+that+protects+users+... For me, "farath.com" is outranking stackoverflow.

I tried you.com[1]. The first few results seem quite relevant. Best part is that you can actually personalize the weights to assign to your search (your very own bubble)

https://you.com/search?q=code%20that%20protects%20users%20fr...

Re: Ask HN: Let's build an HN uBlacklist to improve our Google search results?

#84
post #75

Use a search engine that doesn't fuck up your results instead of trying to unfuck the results it gives you. Why go through this much effort to still give your money to google?

Any recommendation? I use ddg but it's Bing based and the results are no better.

Re: Ask HN: Let's build an HN uBlacklist to improve our Google search results?

#85
post #12

Isn't this Google's job? Are developers a small but lucrative target and so the suits at Google don't see the benefit of improving that experience by cleaning up the spam? Can we just nudge them to do so under the threat of an influential minority leaving due to their use case being affected?

> Isn't this Google's job? Have you searched anything on Google lately? The answer is "no". Their new job seems to be to stuff your results with anything even remotely related (and sometimes related in a way that only machine learning can see) so you have things to click on. Edit: with the lone exception of "find me this bussiness nearby".

If I search for a business name its normally not the first result any more. Usually an advert for another company in the same space I dont want to use (basically an offensive / scamming result from user perspective) and then also the standard "buy search term on amazon".

Re: Ask HN: Let's build an HN uBlacklist to improve our Google search results?

#86
post #83
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which are better in this regard?

Kagi imo, will be paid though.

And waitlist atm (which I'm on). Having to pay for a search engine would be a feature not a bug, IMO.

Re: Ask HN: Let's build an HN uBlacklist to improve our Google search results?

#88

Isn't this Google's job? Are developers a small but lucrative target and so the suits at Google don't see the benefit of improving that experience by cleaning up the spam? Can we just nudge them to do so under the threat of an influential minority leaving due to their use case being affected?

Are you paying them to do it?

Re: Ask HN: Let's build an HN uBlacklist to improve our Google search results?

#89

Isn't this Google's job? Are developers a small but lucrative target and so the suits at Google don't see the benefit of improving that experience by cleaning up the spam? Can we just nudge them to do so under the threat of an influential minority leaving due to their use case being affected?

Is there a word for this tendency to say, "it's someone else's job" as a justification for doing nothing at all to help or improve one's own circumstances? I see more and more of it in the public discourse over the last years and it kind of bothers me. I see it a lot in conversations related to poverty or climate change, but it is as we see here by no means exclusive to those topics. To the original replyer: you coul…

> Is there a word for this tendency to say, "it's someone else's job"

At the risk of sounding pretentious, I call it "socialist", since they spend their lives telling others what to do or what is good or not for the rest of us but they rarely do anything about it. Surprisingly, this is the group that is really worried about poverty and climate change and do as much as I do for it, with the difference that I do it by myself, the few times I do it, not requiring the rest to do it.

It is always someone else who will do it. Though the other day I had a conversation with a non-socialist person that had that same attitude ("other should do it") towards what OTHERS should do. I really dislike that attitude, no matter where it comes from.

Point at hand: when I want or promote something, I am the first one to do it no matter others do it or not. The rest, no matter the ideology, all b*llshit.

As imperfect as I am, I try to do what I think is good (and sometimes my imperfection prevents me from doing it) but I do not spend my life telling other people why they are worse than me and telling them what they should do or not. The most I have for someone is good suggestions, never requirements.

Post reply on HN