Judge cuts $2B verdict against Bayer to $86M (2019)
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Judge cuts $2B verdict against Bayer to $86M (2019)
#2When is it time to engineer RoundUp ready humans too?
Re: Judge cuts $2B verdict against Bayer to $86M (2019)
#3When is it time to engineer RoundUp ready humans too?
As soon as it's profitable.
Re: Judge cuts $2B verdict against Bayer to $86M (2019)
#4When is it time to engineer RoundUp ready humans too?
No need, Bayer AG has been poisoning and murdering humans for 158 years and has developed complete resistance to being held accountable.
Re: Judge cuts $2B verdict against Bayer to $86M (2019)
#5That verdict and the final penalty of 86M should rightfully have been dealt to Monsanto.
Re: Judge cuts $2B verdict against Bayer to $86M (2019)
#6When is it time to engineer RoundUp ready humans too?
Imagine genetic modification being advertised to expectant mothers. It could work on a subscription basis. The parent makes a one-time payment before birth for the modification. Then after the child's 18th birthday the corporation gets a percentage of their income each year for life. If they don't pay then the corporation gets to reclaim their property.
Re: Judge cuts $2B verdict against Bayer to $86M (2019)
#7No post body was provided.
Re: Judge cuts $2B verdict against Bayer to $86M (2019)
#8When is it time to engineer RoundUp ready humans too?
Imagine genetic modification being advertised to expectant mothers. It could work on a subscription basis. The parent makes a one-time payment before birth for the modification. Then after the child's 18th birthday the corporation gets a percentage of their income each year for life. If they don't pay then the corporation gets to reclaim their property.
>reclaim their property
No no, highly illegal and immoral.
Instead your kid is born a beautiful genius, and you pay monthly for 'personalized DNA stabilization boosters' (cant take someone elses, individually copyrighted formula) for the rest of his life.