Earlier quoted context omitted.
This looks like a case of the contrarian dynamic [1]. Dismissive comments tend to appear first, not because they represent the community, but because they're the fastest to write. Often there's a wave of such comments objecting to the OP, followed by a second wave objecting to the objections with some variation of "I can't believe how negative the comments here are". The irony is that they're driven by the same impul…
Idk. Feels like HN has been veering this direction over the last year or so, and the comments are becoming markedly negative, critical comments about everything. I'm not sure it's a problem HN can solve at all. But I definitely agree with GP. The post the other day about the individual leaving the C++ community (something like "Wrapping Up 2021") was an absolute nightmare thread basically dismissing the author as men…
Vanta.js: Animated 3D backgrounds for websites
71–80 of 107 posts
Re: Vanta.js: Animated 3D backgrounds for websites
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
This looks like a case of the contrarian dynamic [1]. Dismissive comments tend to appear first, not because they represent the community, but because they're the fastest to write. Often there's a wave of such comments objecting to the OP, followed by a second wave objecting to the objections with some variation of "I can't believe how negative the comments here are". The irony is that they're driven by the same impul…
What if we force people to wait before they can comment?
Re: Vanta.js: Animated 3D backgrounds for websites
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
This looks like a case of the contrarian dynamic [1]. Dismissive comments tend to appear first, not because they represent the community, but because they're the fastest to write. Often there's a wave of such comments objecting to the OP, followed by a second wave objecting to the objections with some variation of "I can't believe how negative the comments here are". The irony is that they're driven by the same impul…
Idk. Feels like HN has been veering this direction over the last year or so, and the comments are becoming markedly negative, critical comments about everything. I'm not sure it's a problem HN can solve at all. But I definitely agree with GP. The post the other day about the individual leaving the C++ community (something like "Wrapping Up 2021") was an absolute nightmare thread basically dismissing the author as men…
The way these perceptions tend to work is that we notice a few data points and then jump to a general conclusion. Remember the so-called primitive tribe that supposedly could only count "1, 2, 3, many"? It seems that's basically how all our minds work. The trouble is that a stochastic data feed like HN inevitably generates as many such sequences as you could ask for. It's really the mind that decides which sequence to pick out and deem representative. This leads to false feelings of generality (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...).
(Edit: for example, look at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29781019 and how positive the top comments are at the moment. The stochastic feed generates lots of those datapoints too!)
What's worse, those feelings have consequences, since they lead to a "why bother" sense of no longer needing to take care of this place or do one's part of build up the culture. If it's all just a shitshow, why not just add more shit? everyone else is, right? Well, no—that's not true at all.
This is not to say that the problems you mention aren't real. They are, and it's important to work on them, and we spend a lot of time trying to persuade people to work on them. It's in everyone's interest to do that, so we can achieve at least part of what we all want here, which is to have an interesting internet forum that doesn't suck.
We should also all be cautious about seeing other people as the problem ("completely wrecked by nay-sayers and just generally unpleasant people anymore, it seems"). My experience is that if we look honestly at ourselves we find all the same things to be true there too, and that's a more productive place to work.
Re: Vanta.js: Animated 3D backgrounds for websites
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like, what if we make them wait forever? That would be awesome. FWIW as much as I hate to accept dang's logic of the overcoming anti-anti-ness of every thread, it does seem true, so why not just let the thing play out...?
> why not just let the thing play out I think because it could kill the thread, or demotivate the OP. People reflexively rejecting my contributions would demotivate me.
Re: Vanta.js: Animated 3D backgrounds for websites
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lively[1] does this with desktop wallpapers if that helps and is FOSS. Additional shaders can be found on shadertoy[2] and others. It can be a good way of turning your computer into a heater ;) [1] https://rocksdanister.github.io/lively/ [2] https://www.shadertoy.com/
That's really nice. Mac OS needs to get some shadertoy desktops asap. I can't even get a toaster to fly anymore :(
Re: Vanta.js: Animated 3D backgrounds for websites
#76Crashed latest iOS safari. Something like this probably should be disabled on mobile anyways to be nice to visitors’ battery
Re: Vanta.js: Animated 3D backgrounds for websites
#77Safari on top-spec M1 > entire system lags
Re: Vanta.js: Animated 3D backgrounds for websites
#78Pretty sure the clouds one is a straight rip from one of Inigo Quilez's shaders: https://www.shadertoy.com/view/XslGRr (note the licence at the top...)
Re: Vanta.js: Animated 3D backgrounds for websites
#79This is nice stuff - I just wish it wasn't "for website backgrounds"...?! Can these just be screensavers? Please?
Re: Vanta.js: Animated 3D backgrounds for websites
#80Similar background generator found here https://www.finisher.co/lab/header/
Very cool tool!